IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0229560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics

Author

Listed:
  • George Amadeus Prenosil
  • Thilo Weitzel
  • Markus Fürstner
  • Michael Hentschel
  • Thomas Krause
  • Paul Cumming
  • Axel Rominger
  • Bernd Klaeser

Abstract

Purpose: Image texture is increasingly used to discriminate tissues and lesions in PET/CT. For quantification or in computer-aided diagnosis, textural feature analysis must produce robust and comparable values. Because statistical feature values depend on image count statistics, we investigated in depth the stability of Haralick features values as functions of acquisition duration, and for common image resolutions and reconstructions. Methods: A homogeneous cylindrical phantom containing 9.6 kBq/ml Ge-68 was repeatedly imaged on a Siemens Biograph mCT, with acquisition durations ranging from three seconds to three hours. Images with 1.5, 2, and 4 mm isometrically spaced voxels were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and the Siemens TrueX algorithm. We analysed Haralick features derived from differently quantized (3 to 8-bit) grey level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) as functions of exposure E, which we defined as the product of activity concentration in a volume of interest (VOI) and acquisition duration. The VOI was a 50 mm wide cube at the centre of the phantom. Feature stability was defined for df/dE → 0. Results: The most stable feature values occurred in low resolution FBPs, whereas some feature values from 1.5 mm TrueX reconstructions ranged over two orders of magnitude. Within the same reconstructions, most feature value-exposure curves reached stable plateaus at similar exposures, regardless of GLCM quantization. With 8-bit GLCM, median time to stability was 16 s and 22 s for FBPs, 18 s and 125 s for OSEM, and 23 s, 45 s, and 76 s for PSF reconstructions, with longer durations for higher resolutions. Stable exposures coincided in OSEM and TrueX reconstructions with image noise distributions converging to a Gaussian. In FBP, the occurrence of stable values coincided the disappearance of negatives image values in the VOI. Conclusions: Haralick feature values depend strongly on exposure, but invariance exists within defined domains of exposure. Here, we present an easily replicable procedure to identify said stable exposure domains, where image noise does not substantially add to textural feature values. Only by imaging at predetermined feature-invariant exposure levels and by adjusting exposure to expected activity concentrations, can textural features have a quantitative use in PET/CT. The necessary exposure levels are attainable by modern PET/CT systems in clinical routine.

Suggested Citation

  • George Amadeus Prenosil & Thilo Weitzel & Markus Fürstner & Michael Hentschel & Thomas Krause & Paul Cumming & Axel Rominger & Bernd Klaeser, 2020. "Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0229560
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229560
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0229560&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0229560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tommy Löfstedt & Patrik Brynolfsson & Thomas Asklund & Tufve Nyholm & Anders Garpebring, 2019. "Gray-level invariant Haralick texture features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Clément Bailly & Caroline Bodet-Milin & Solène Couespel & Hatem Necib & Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré & Catherine Ansquer & Thomas Carlier, 2016. "Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel B Ger & Joseph G Meier & Raymond B Pahlka & Skylar Gay & Raymond Mumme & Clifton D Fuller & Heng Li & Rebecca M Howell & Rick R Layman & R Jason Stafford & Shouhao Zhou & Osama Mawlawi & Lauren, 2019. "Effects of alterations in positron emission tomography imaging parameters on radiomics features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Hongdong Wang & Meng Lei & Ming Li & Yilin Chen & Jin Jiang & Liang Zou, 2019. "Intelligent Estimation of Vitrinite Reflectance of Coal from Photomicrographs Based on Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Ivan S Klyuzhin & Jessie F Fu & Andy Hong & Matthew Sacheli & Nikolay Shenkov & Michele Matarazzo & Arman Rahmim & A Jon Stoessl & Vesna Sossi, 2018. "Data-driven, voxel-based analysis of brain PET images: Application of PCA and LASSO methods to visualize and quantify patterns of neurodegeneration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0229560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.