IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0228842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling of predictors used to estimate glomerular filtration rate: Insight into lateral collinearity

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade
  • Helio Tedesco-Silva

Abstract

Background: One overlooked problem in statistical analysis is lateral collinearity, a phenomenon that may occur when the outcome variable derives from the predictors. In nephrology this issue is seen with the use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as an outcome and age, sex, and ethnicity as predictors. In this study with simulated data, we aim to illustrate this problem. Methods: We randomly generated unrelated data to estimate eGFR by common equations. Results: Using simulated data, we show that age, gender, and ethnicity (recycled predictors variables) are statistically significantly correlated with eGFR in linear regression analysis. Whereas the initial obvious conclusion is that age, sex, and ethnicity are strong predictors of eGFR, more rigorous interpretation suggests that this is a byproduct of the mathematical model produced when deriving new predictors from another. Conclusion: While statistical models have the ability to identify vertical collinearity (predictor-predictor), lateral collinearity (predictor-outcome) is seldom identified and discussed in statistical analysis. Therefore, caution is needed when interpreting the correlation between age, gender, and ethnicity with eGFR derived from regression analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade & Helio Tedesco-Silva, 2020. "Recycling of predictors used to estimate glomerular filtration rate: Insight into lateral collinearity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228842
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228842
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228842&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0228842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.