IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0228207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the CareStart™ glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) rapid diagnostic test in the field settings and assessment of perceived risk from primaquine at the community level in Cambodia

Author

Listed:
  • Bertha Wojnarski
  • Chanthap Lon
  • Darapiseth Sea
  • Somethy Sok
  • Sabaithip Sriwichai
  • Soklyda Chann
  • Sohei Hom
  • Threechada Boonchan
  • Sokna Ly
  • Chandara Sok
  • Samon Nou
  • Pheaktra Oung
  • Nareth Kong
  • Vannak Pheap
  • Khengheang Thay
  • Vy Dao
  • Worachet Kuntawunginn
  • Mitra Feldman
  • Panita Gosi
  • Nillawan Buathong
  • Mali Ittiverakul
  • Nichapat Uthaimongkol
  • Rekol Huy
  • Michele Spring
  • Dysoley Lek
  • Philip Smith
  • Mark M Fukuda
  • Mariusz Wojnarski

Abstract

Background: Primaquine is an approved radical cure treatment for Plasmodium vivax malaria but treatment can result in life-threatening hemolysis if given to a glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient (G6PDd) patient. There is a need for reliable point-of-care G6PD diagnostic tests. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the CareStart™ rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) and village malaria workers (VMWs) in field settings, and to better understand user perceptions about the risks and benefits of PQ treatment guided by RDT results. Methods: This study enrolled 105 HCWs and VMWs, herein referred to as trainees, who tested 1,543 healthy adult male volunteers from 84 villages in Cambodia. The trainees were instructed on G6PD screening, primaquine case management, and completed pre and post-training questionnaires. Each trainee tested up to 16 volunteers in the field under observation by the study staff. Results: Out of 1,542 evaluable G6PD volunteers, 251 (16.28%) had quantitative enzymatic activity less than 30% of an adjusted male median (8.30 U/g Hb). There was no significant difference in test sensitivity in detecting G6PDd between trainees (97.21%), expert study staff in the field (98.01%), and in a laboratory setting (95.62%) (p = 0.229); however, test specificity was different for trainees (96.62%), expert study staff in the field (98.14%), and experts in the laboratory (98.99%) (p

Suggested Citation

  • Bertha Wojnarski & Chanthap Lon & Darapiseth Sea & Somethy Sok & Sabaithip Sriwichai & Soklyda Chann & Sohei Hom & Threechada Boonchan & Sokna Ly & Chandara Sok & Samon Nou & Pheaktra Oung & Nareth Ko, 2020. "Evaluation of the CareStart™ glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) rapid diagnostic test in the field settings and assessment of perceived risk from primaquine at the community level in Cambodia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228207
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228207&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0228207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.