IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Willem Elting
  • Marit L Sanders
  • Ronney B Panerai
  • Marcel Aries
  • Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
  • Alexander Caicedo
  • Max Chacon
  • Erik D Gommer
  • Sabine Van Huffel
  • José L Jara
  • Kyriaki Kostoglou
  • Adam Mahdi
  • Vasilis Z Marmarelis
  • Georgios D Mitsis
  • Martin Müller
  • Dragana Nikolic
  • Ricardo C Nogueira
  • Stephen J Payne
  • Corina Puppo
  • Dae C Shin
  • David M Simpson
  • Takashi Tarumi
  • Bernardo Yelicich
  • Rong Zhang
  • Jurgen A H R Claassen

Abstract

We tested the influence of blood pressure variability on the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) estimates. Data were analyzed from the 2nd CARNet bootstrap initiative, where mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and end tidal CO2 were measured twice in 75 healthy subjects. DCA was analyzed by 14 different centers with a variety of different analysis methods. Intraclass Correlation (ICC) values increased significantly when subjects with low power spectral density MABP (PSD-MABP) values were removed from the analysis for all gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI) parameters. Gain in the low frequency band (LF) had the highest ICC, followed by phase LF and gain in the very low frequency band. No significant differences were found between analysis methods for gain parameters, but for phase and ARI parameters, significant differences between the analysis methods were found. Alternatively, the Spearman-Brown prediction formula indicated that prolongation of the measurement duration up to 35 minutes may be needed to achieve good reproducibility for some DCA parameters. We conclude that poor DCA reproducibility (ICC 0.6) values when cases with low PSD-MABP are removed, and probably also when measurement duration is increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Willem Elting & Marit L Sanders & Ronney B Panerai & Marcel Aries & Edson Bor-Seng-Shu & Alexander Caicedo & Max Chacon & Erik D Gommer & Sabine Van Huffel & José L Jara & Kyriaki Kostoglou & Adam, 2020. "Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227651
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227651
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227651&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.