IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prescribing trends of glaucoma drugs in six major cities of China from 2013 to 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Lingyan Yu
  • Kai Ding
  • Lifang Luo
  • Zhenwei Yu

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prescribing trends of glaucoma drugs in six major cities of China from 2013 to 2017. Methods: A descriptive analysis using pharmacy prescription data was conducted. Outpatient prescription data was extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project. Prescribing patterns, trends of visits, and corresponding expenditures for glaucoma medications were analyzed. Results: A total of 84297 ambulatory prescriptions were included in the current study. Visits by glaucoma patients increased from 13808 in 2013 to 20060 in 2017. Over the same period, the yearly expenditure for glaucoma drugs increased from 2.33 million to 3.95 million Chinese Yuan (CNY). Among all the six classes of glaucoma drugs (prostaglandin analogues, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α-receptor agonists, β-receptor antagonists, cholinergic agonists and fixed combinations), β-receptor antagonists were the most commonly prescribed in 2013, accounting for 34.3% of patients, but gradually decreased to 27.1% in 2017. Prostaglandin analogues became the most frequently prescribed drugs in 2017, accounting for 30.2% of the visits. Prostaglandin analogues are the most expensive and yielded a total expenditure of 2.34 million CNY in 2017, followed by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α-receptor agonists, β-receptor antagonists, fixed combinations, and cholinergic agonists. Combination therapy became increasingly prescribed in 2017. Conclusion: Glaucoma prescribing practices exhibited substantial changes over the study period. The number of glaucoma prescriptions continuously increased from 2013 to 2017, leading to increased prescription costs. These findings implied a similar trend observed in previous studies, as well as recommendations in the appropriate guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingyan Yu & Kai Ding & Lifang Luo & Zhenwei Yu, 2020. "Prescribing trends of glaucoma drugs in six major cities of China from 2013 to 2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227595
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227595&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi-Ming Li & Ru Chen & Yuan Li & Zhi-Rong Yang & Qiu-Ju Deng & Zheng Zhong & Moh-Lim Ong & Si-Yan Zhan, 2014. "Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Latanoprost with Timolol in the Treatment of Asian Populations with Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.