IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0225958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microscopic distance from tumor invasion front to serosa might be a useful predictive factor for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of T3-gastric cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Shingo Togano
  • Masakazu Yashiro
  • Yuichiro Miki
  • Yurie Yamamato
  • Tomohiro Sera
  • Yukako Kushitani
  • Atsushi Sugimoto
  • Shuhei Kushiyama
  • Sadaaki Nishimura
  • Kenji Kuroda
  • Tomohisa Okuno
  • Mami Yoshii
  • Tatsuro Tamura
  • Takahiro Toyokawa
  • Hiroaki Tanaka
  • Kazuya Muguruma
  • Sayaka Tanaka
  • Masaichi Ohira

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal recurrence is one of the most frequent recurrent diseases in gastric cancer. Although the exposure of cancer cells to the serosal surface is considered a common risk factor for peritoneal recurrence, there are some cases of peritoneal recurrence without infiltration to the serosal surface even after curative surgery. This study sought to clarify the risk factors of peritoneal recurrence in the absence of invasion to the serosal surface. Materials and methods: Ninety-six patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery were enrolled. In all 96 cases, the depth of tumor invasion was subserosal (T3). The microscopic distance from the tumor invasion front to the serosa (DIFS) was measured using tissue slides by H&E staining and pan-cytokeratin staining. E-cadherin expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Results: Among the 96 patients, 16 developed peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery. The DIFS of the tumors with peritoneal recurrence (156±220 μm) was significantly shorter (p = 0.011) than that without peritoneal recurrence (360±478 μm). Peritoneal recurrence was significantly correlated with DIFS ≤234 μm (p = 0.023), but not with E-cadherin expression. The prognosis of DIFS ≤234 μm was significantly poorer than that of DIFS >234 μm (log rank, p = 0.007). A multivariate analysis of the patients' five-year overall survival revealed that DIFS ≤234 μm and lymph node metastasis were significantly correlated with survival (p = 0.005, p = 0.032, respectively). Conclusion: The measurement of the DIFS might be useful for the prediction of peritoneal recurrence in T3-gastric cancer patients after curative surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Shingo Togano & Masakazu Yashiro & Yuichiro Miki & Yurie Yamamato & Tomohiro Sera & Yukako Kushitani & Atsushi Sugimoto & Shuhei Kushiyama & Sadaaki Nishimura & Kenji Kuroda & Tomohisa Okuno & Mami Yo, 2020. "Microscopic distance from tumor invasion front to serosa might be a useful predictive factor for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of T3-gastric cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225958
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225958&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0225958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.