IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0224176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Rita M Traxler
  • Tsira Napetvaridze
  • Zviad Asanishvili
  • Marika Geleishvili
  • Ketevan Rukhadze
  • Giorgi Maghlakelidze
  • Mariam Broladze
  • Maka Kokhreidze
  • Edmond F Maes
  • Debby Reynolds
  • Mo Salman
  • Sean V Shadomy
  • Sangeeta Rao

Abstract

Introduction: Anthrax is endemic in Georgia and recent outbreaks prompted a livestock-handler case-control study with a component to evaluate anthrax knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among livestock handlers or owners. Methods: Cases were handlers of livestock with confirmed animal anthrax from June 2013-May 2015. Handlers of four matched unaffected animals were selected as controls, two from the same village as the case animal (“village control”) and two from 3–10 km away (“area control”). Descriptive statistics were reported and conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the magnitude of the association of cases with specific study KAP factors. Results: Cases were more likely male, had lower level college education, less animal care experience, and provided more animal care to their cattle. Cases had lower odds of burying a suddenly dead animal compared to all controls (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.12, 0.88) and area controls (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.91). On an 8-point knowledge scale, cases having an animal with anthrax had a 1.31 times greater knowledge score compared to all controls (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67). Cases had higher odds of ever having human anthrax or knowing another person who had anthrax compared to all controls (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 1.45, 14.30) and area controls (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.52, 33.80). Discussion: Cases were more knowledgeable of anthrax and had better anthrax prevention practices, but these are likely a result of the case investigation and ring vaccination following the death of their animal. Conclusions: The findings reveal a low level of knowledge and practices related to anthrax control and prevention, and will guide educational material development to fill these gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita M Traxler & Tsira Napetvaridze & Zviad Asanishvili & Marika Geleishvili & Ketevan Rukhadze & Giorgi Maghlakelidze & Mariam Broladze & Maka Kokhreidze & Edmond F Maes & Debby Reynolds & Mo Salman , 2019. "Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224176
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224176&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0224176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.