IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0222890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining age-related decline in theory of mind: Evidence for intact competence but compromised executive function

Author

Listed:
  • Isu Cho
  • Adam S Cohen

Abstract

Previous studies suggest theory of mind (ToM) ability declines with age. However, prior tasks not only required ToM competence but also imposed high executive function (EF) demands, so decline in ToM ability could be caused by deterioration in ToM competence, EF, or both. It was predicted that if the elderly have intact ToM competence but compromised EF, then they should perform similarly to younger adults when using ToM tasks that lower executive demands, such as spontaneous-response tasks. Results showed that on tasks with reduced demands, older adults tracked belief to the same extent as younger adults, despite their declining EF. The findings support a model in which age-related decline in ToM ability is primarily caused by compromised EF, not ToM competence, suggesting that underlying ToM mechanisms are still intact in the elderly. We discuss implications of this work for competence-performance issues in ToM processing and the underlying sources of age-related deterioration of ToM.

Suggested Citation

  • Isu Cho & Adam S Cohen, 2019. "Explaining age-related decline in theory of mind: Evidence for intact competence but compromised executive function," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222890
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222890
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222890&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0222890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phoebe E. Bailey & Julie D. Henry, 2008. "Growing Less Empathic With Age: Disinhibition of the Self-Perspective," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(4), pages 219-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillian Slessor & Cristina Venturini & Emily J. Bonny & Pauline M. Insch & Anna Rokaszewicz & Ailbhe N. Finnerty, 2016. "Specificity of Age-Related Differences in Eye-Gaze Following: Evidence From Social and Nonsocial Stimuli," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(1), pages 11-22.
    2. Juan José Alarcón-Jiménez & Adriana Nielsen-Rodríguez & Ramón Romance & Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas & M. Rosa Bernal-López, 2020. "Physical Activity and Social Cognition in the Elderly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, June.
    3. R Asaad Baksh & Sharon Abrahams & Bonnie Auyeung & Sarah E MacPherson, 2018. "The Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT): Examining the effects of age on a new measure of theory of mind and social norm understanding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.