IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An individual patient-data meta-analysis of metronomic oral vinorelbine in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Pujol
  • Amandine Coffy
  • Andrea Camerini
  • Athanasios Kotsakis
  • Manlio Mencoboni
  • Milena Gusella
  • Felice Pasini
  • Aldo Pezzuto
  • Giuseppe Luigi Banna
  • Cemil Bilir
  • Epaminontas Samantas
  • Fabrice Barlesi
  • Benoît Roch
  • Aude Guillou
  • Jean-Pierre Daurès

Abstract

Introduction: Several non-comparative phase II studies have evaluated metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but the small size of each study limits their conclusions. Purpose: To perform an individual patient-data metaanalysis of studies evaluating MOV in metastatic NSCLC in order to measure survival and safety of treatment with this regimen. Methods: Studies were selected if (1) administration of oral vinorelbine thrice a week; (2) fixed daily dose comprised between 30 and 50 mg, and; (3) being published before October 4th 2018. Database encompassed 8 variables characterizing disease and demography, 3 informing therapy, and 12 describing survival and toxicity. Results: Nine studies encompassing 418 patients fulfilled the selection criteria, 80% of them having frailty characteristics. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 months (95%CI: 7.6–9.5). OSrates at 6 months, one year and at two years after starting vinorelbine were 64%, 30.3% and 8.9%, respectively. In the Cox model, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) = 2, and anemia of any grade were significant determinants of shorter OS. Median progression-free survival(PFS) was 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.9–5). At 6 months and at one-year, PFS rates were 35% and 11.9% respectively. In the Cox model stratified for the variable “study”, PS = 2and stage IV were significant determinants of shorter PFS. No toxicity was reported for 40% of patients, and 66 (15.8%) patients experienced a grade 3–4 toxicity. The most frequent toxicity was anemia of any grade (35.8%) that was higher with the 50 mg dosage. Conclusion: MOV is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC and is a manageable therapy in frail patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Pujol & Amandine Coffy & Andrea Camerini & Athanasios Kotsakis & Manlio Mencoboni & Milena Gusella & Felice Pasini & Aldo Pezzuto & Giuseppe Luigi Banna & Cemil Bilir & Epaminontas Samantas, 2019. "An individual patient-data meta-analysis of metronomic oral vinorelbine in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220988
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220988
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220988&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.