IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients with an ultra-high expression of programmed death ligand-1 treated using pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Ryuya Edahiro
  • Masaki Kanazu
  • Hiroyuki Kurebe
  • Masahide Mori
  • Daichi Fujimoto
  • Yoshihiko Taniguchi
  • Hidekazu Suzuki
  • Katsuya Hirano
  • Toshihide Yokoyama
  • Mitsunori Morita
  • Yasushi Fukuda
  • Junji Uchida
  • Takeshi Makio
  • Motohiro Tamiya

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab is currently approved as a first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%. However, the association between the efficacy of pembrolizumab and PD-L1 expression levels in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% has not been fully elucidated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% who received pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy at 11 institutions in Japan between February 2017 and January 2018. Patients were divided into TPS 50–89% and TPS 90–100% (ultra-high PD-L1 expression) cohorts. Results: In total, 149 patients were included: 99 (66.4%) and 50 (33.6%) patients were in the TPS 50–89% and TPS 90–100% cohorts, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the TPS 90–100% and TPS 50–89% cohorts. The objective response rates (ORR) in the TPS 90–100% and TPS 50–89% cohorts were 58.0% and 46.5%, respectively (p = 0.23). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was longer in the TPS 90–100% cohort than in the TPS 50–89% cohort (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42–1.07; p = 0.09). Although TTF within 120 days after the initiation of pembrolizumab therapy was comparable between both cohorts (p = 0.54), TTF after 120 days was significantly longer in the TPS 90–100% cohort than in the TPS 50–89% cohort (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06–0.87; p = 0.031). Immune related adverse events of grade 3 or more occurred in 16.0% and 19.2% of patients in the TPS 90–100% and TPS 50–89% cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The patients with an ultra-high PD-L1 expression continued pembrolizumab therapy longer, driven by a reduced risk of treatment failure in the late phase. PD-L1 expression levels might be a predictive biomarker of a first-line immunotherapy benefit in the late phase among NSCLC patients with TPS ≥50%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryuya Edahiro & Masaki Kanazu & Hiroyuki Kurebe & Masahide Mori & Daichi Fujimoto & Yoshihiko Taniguchi & Hidekazu Suzuki & Katsuya Hirano & Toshihide Yokoyama & Mitsunori Morita & Yasushi Fukuda & Ju, 2019. "Clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients with an ultra-high expression of programmed death ligand-1 treated using pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy: A retrospective multicenter coh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220570
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220570&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.