IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptom improvement and predictors associated with improvement after 6 weeks of alpha-blocker therapy: An exploratory, single-arm, open-label cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Henk van der Worp
  • Boudewijn J Kollen
  • Tom Vermist
  • Martijn G Steffens
  • Marco H Blanker

Abstract

Objectives: Clinicians should not only know how many patients will benefit from alpha-blocker therapy but should also be able to identify who will benefit. We studied the changes in patient symptoms following alpha-blocker therapy and the predictors of symptom improvement in clinical practice. Design: This was a single-arm, open-label observational cohort study with a 6-week follow-up. Setting: Twenty-two pharmacies in the Netherlands. Participants: Patients were eligible for inclusion if they attended a pharmacy with a new prescription for an alpha-blocker from a general practitioner or urologist. Primary and secondary outcomes: Outcomes were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Demographic, disease-related, and drug-related information were collected to identify predictors of symptom improvement. These predictors were then assessed by logistic and linear regression analyses of both the original data set and an imputed data set that accounted for the missing variables. Results: During the study, 37% of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms perceived clear symptomatic improvement based on the results of the PGI-I. Improvement was more likely in those who still used alpha-blockers at the end of the 6-week study period and in those who used multiple medications. Although symptom scores decreased significantly on the IPSS and OAB-q SF, the only predictor of change was the pretreatment symptom severity. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of our cohort perceived symptom improvement on alpha-blocker therapy. However, we identified no clear predictors of who might benefit from alpha-blocker treatment, indicating that alpha-blockers should still be prescribed on a trial basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Henk van der Worp & Boudewijn J Kollen & Tom Vermist & Martijn G Steffens & Marco H Blanker, 2019. "Symptom improvement and predictors associated with improvement after 6 weeks of alpha-blocker therapy: An exploratory, single-arm, open-label cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220417
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220417
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220417&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.