IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)

Author

Listed:
  • Frank J Wolters
  • Qiong Yang
  • Mary L Biggs
  • Johanna Jakobsdottir
  • Shuo Li
  • Daniel S Evans
  • Joshua C Bis
  • Tamara B Harris
  • Ramachandran S Vasan
  • Nuno R Zilhao
  • Mohsen Ghanbari
  • M Arfan Ikram
  • Lenore Launer
  • Bruce M Psaty
  • Gregory J Tranah
  • Alexander M Kulminski
  • Vilmundur Gudnason
  • Sudha Seshadri
  • for the E2-CHARGE investigators

Abstract

Background: Apolipoprotein E is a glycoprotein best known as a mediator and regulator of lipid transport and uptake. The APOE-ε4 allele has long been associated with increased risks of Alzheimer's disease and mortality, but the effect of the less prevalent APOE-ε2 allele on diseases in the elderly and survival remains elusive. Methods: We aggregated data of 38,537 individuals of European ancestry (mean age 65.5 years; 55.6% women) from six population-based cohort studies (Rotterdam Study, AGES-Reykjavik Study, Cardiovascular Health Study, Health-ABC Study, and the family-based Framingham Heart Study and Long Life Family Study) to determine the association of APOE, and in particular APOE-ε2, with survival in the population. Results: During a mean follow-up of 11.7 years, 17,021 individuals died. Compared with homozygous APOE-ε3 carriers, APOE-ε2 carriers were at lower risk of death (hazard ratio,95% confidence interval: 0.94,0.90–0.99; P = 1.1*10−2), whereas APOE-ε4 carriers were at increased risk of death (HR 1.17,1.12–1.21; P = 2.8*10−16). APOE was associated with mortality risk in a dose-dependent manner, with risk estimates lowest for homozygous APOE-ε2 (HR 0.89,0.74–1.08), and highest for homozygous APOE-ε4 (HR 1.52,1.37–1.70). After censoring for dementia, effect estimates remained similar for APOE-ε2 (HR 0.95,0.90–1.01), but attenuated for APOE-ε4 (HR 1.07,1.01–1.12). Results were broadly similar across cohorts, and did not differ by age or sex. APOE genotype was associated with baseline lipid fractions (e.g. mean difference(95%CI) in LDL(mg/dL) for ε2 versus ε33: -17.1(-18.1–16.0), and ε4 versus ε33: +5.7(4.8;6.5)), but the association between APOE and mortality was unaltered after adjustment for baseline LDL or cardiovascular disease. Given the European ancestry of the study population, results may not apply to other ethnicities. Conclusion: Compared with APOE-ε3, APOE-ε2 is associated with prolonged survival, whereas mortality risk is increased for APOE-ε4 carriers. Further collaborative efforts are needed to unravel the role of APOE and in particular APOE-ε2 in health and disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank J Wolters & Qiong Yang & Mary L Biggs & Johanna Jakobsdottir & Shuo Li & Daniel S Evans & Joshua C Bis & Tamara B Harris & Ramachandran S Vasan & Nuno R Zilhao & Mohsen Ghanbari & M Arfan Ikram , 2019. "The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219668&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.