IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • John M Lachin
  • Ionut Bebu
  • Michael D Larsen
  • Naji Younes

Abstract

Introduction: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest. Methods: Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis H ˜ such that the type I error probability is preserved if H ⇒ H ˜ such that rejection of H ˜ implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space. Conclusion: Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction.

Suggested Citation

  • John M Lachin & Ionut Bebu & Michael D Larsen & Naji Younes, 2019. "Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219520
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219520&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taddesse Kassahun & Eshetu Wencheko & Arne C. Bathke, 2023. "Nonparametric directional testing for multivariate problems in conjunction with a closed testing principle," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 349-363, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.