IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial

Author

Listed:
  • Brennan Spiegel
  • Garth Fuller
  • Mayra Lopez
  • Taylor Dupuy
  • Benjamin Noah
  • Amber Howard
  • Michael Albert
  • Vartan Tashjian
  • Richard Lam
  • Joseph Ahn
  • Francis Dailey
  • Bradley T Rosen
  • Mark Vrahas
  • Milton Little
  • John Garlich
  • Eldin Dzubur
  • Waguih IsHak
  • Itai Danovitch

Abstract

Objectives: Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as an effective, drug-free tool for pain management, but there is a lack of randomized, controlled data evaluating its effectiveness in hospitalized patients. We sought to measure the impact of on-demand VR versus “health and wellness” television programming for pain in hospitalized patients. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial in hospitalized patients with an average pain score of ≥3 out of 10 points. Patients in the experimental group received a library of 21 VR experiences administered using the Samsung Gear Oculus headset; control patients viewed specialized television programming to promote health and wellness. Clinical staff followed usual care; study interventions were not protocolized. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using a numeric rating scale, as recorded by nursing staff during usual care. Pre- and post-intervention pain scores were compared immediately after initial treatment and after 48- and 72-hours. Results: There were 120 subjects (61 VR; 59 control). The mean within-subject difference in immediate pre- and post-intervention pain scores was larger in the VR group (-1.72 points; SD 3.56) than in the control group (-0.46 points; SD 3.01); this difference was significant in favor of VR (P

Suggested Citation

  • Brennan Spiegel & Garth Fuller & Mayra Lopez & Taylor Dupuy & Benjamin Noah & Amber Howard & Michael Albert & Vartan Tashjian & Richard Lam & Joseph Ahn & Francis Dailey & Bradley T Rosen & Mark Vraha, 2019. "Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219115
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219115
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219115&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.