IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0217701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Grenet
  • Shams Ribault
  • Giao Bao Nguyen
  • Faustine Glais
  • Augustin Metge
  • Thomas Linet
  • Behrouz Kassai-Koupai
  • Catherine Cornu
  • Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant
  • Sylvie Erpeldinger
  • Rémy Boussageon
  • Aurore Gouraud
  • Fabrice Bonnet
  • Michel Cucherat
  • Philippe Moulin
  • François Gueyffier

Abstract

Background: The last international consensus on the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommends SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists for patients with clinical cardiovascular (CV) disease; metformin remains the first-line glucose lowering medication. Last studies suggested beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, in secondary CV prevention. Recently, a potential benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in primary CV prevention also has been suggested. However, no comparison of all the new and the old hypoglycemic drugs is available on CV outcomes. We aimed to compare the effects of old and new hypoglycemic drugs in T2D, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality. Methods and findings: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Randomized trials, blinded or not, assessing contemporary hypoglycemic drugs on mortality or MACE in patients with T2D, were searched for in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. References screening and data extraction were done by multiple observers. Each drug was analyzed according to its therapeutic class. A random Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used. The primary outcomes were overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE. Severe adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also recorded. Conclusions: SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists have the most beneficial effects, especially in T2D patients with previous CV diseases. Direct comparisons of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and metformin are needed, notably in primary CV prevention. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016043823.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Grenet & Shams Ribault & Giao Bao Nguyen & Faustine Glais & Augustin Metge & Thomas Linet & Behrouz Kassai-Koupai & Catherine Cornu & Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant & Sylvie Erpeldinger & Rémy Bo, 2019. "GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217701
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217701&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0217701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rémy Boussageon & Irène Supper & Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant & Nadir Kellou & Michel Cucherat & Jean-Pierre Boissel & Behrouz Kassai & Alain Moreau & François Gueyffier & Catherine Cornu, 2012. "Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajeev Kumar & W S Wassif, 2018. "Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Frail and Elderly Patients," Current Research in Diabetes & Obesity Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(1), pages 19-22, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.