IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0214280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community engagement, social context and coverage of mass anti-malarial administration: Comparative findings from multi-site research in the Greater Mekong sub-Region

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher L Pell
  • Bipin Adhikari
  • May Myo Thwin
  • Ladda Kajeechiwa
  • Suphak Nosten
  • Francois H Nosten
  • Kate M Sahan
  • Frank M Smithuis
  • Thuy-Nhien Nguyen
  • Tran Tinh Hien
  • Rupam Tripura
  • Thomas J Peto
  • Nou Sanann
  • Chea Nguon
  • Tiengkham Pongvongsa
  • Koukeo Phommasone
  • Mayfong Mayxay
  • Mavuto Mukaka
  • Pimnara Peerawaranun
  • Nils Kaehler
  • Phaik Yeong Cheah
  • Nicholas P J Day
  • Nicholas J White
  • Arjen M Dondorp
  • Lorenz von Seidlein

Abstract

Background: Between 2013 and 2017, targeted malaria elimination (TME), a package of interventions that includes mass drug administration (MDA)–was piloted in communities with reservoirs of asymptomatic P. falciparum across the Greater Mekong sub-Region (GMS). Coverage in target communities is a key determinant of the effectiveness of MDA. Drawing on mixed methods research conducted alongside TME pilot studies, this article examines the impact of the community engagement, local social context and study design on MDA coverage. Methods and findings: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected using questionnaire-based surveys, semi-structured and in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, informal conversations, and observations of study activities. Over 1500 respondents were interviewed in Myanmar, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Interview topics included attitudes to malaria and experiences of MDA. Overall coverage of mass anti-malarial administration was high, particularly participation in at least a single round (85%). Familiarity with and concern about malaria prompted participation in MDA; as did awareness of MDA and familiarity with the aim of eliminating malaria. Fear of adverse events and blood draws discouraged people. Hence, community engagement activities sought to address these concerns but their impact was mediated by the trust relationships that study staff could engender in communities. In contexts of weak healthcare infrastructure and (cash) poverty, communities valued the study’s ancillary care and the financial compensation. However, coverage did not necessarily decrease in the absence of cash compensation. Community dynamics, affected by politics, village conformity, and household decision-making also affected coverage. Conclusions: The experimental nature of TME presented particular challenges to achieving high coverage. Nonetheless, the findings reflect those from studies of MDA under implementation conditions and offer useful guidance for potential regional roll-out of MDA: it is key to understand target communities and provide appropriate information in tailored ways, using community engagement that engenders trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher L Pell & Bipin Adhikari & May Myo Thwin & Ladda Kajeechiwa & Suphak Nosten & Francois H Nosten & Kate M Sahan & Frank M Smithuis & Thuy-Nhien Nguyen & Tran Tinh Hien & Rupam Tripura & Thom, 2019. "Community engagement, social context and coverage of mass anti-malarial administration: Comparative findings from multi-site research in the Greater Mekong sub-Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214280
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214280&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0214280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.