IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0212086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of healthcare services at the end of life in decedents compared to their surviving counterparts: A case-control study among adults born before 1946 in Friuli Venezia Giulia

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Canova
  • Paola Anello
  • Claudio Barbiellini Amidei
  • Vito Parolin
  • Loris Zanier
  • Lorenzo Simonato

Abstract

Background: There is a heterogeneous literature on healthcare utilization patterns at the end of life. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of closeness to death on the utilization of acute hospital-based healthcare services and some primary healthcare services and compare differences in gender, age groups and major causes of death disease specific mortality. Methods: A matched case-control study, nested in a cohort of 411,812 subjects, linked to administrative databases was conducted. All subjects were residents in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Italy), born before 1946, alive in January 2000 and were followed up to December 2014. Overall, 158,571 decedents/cases were matched by gender and year of birth to one control, alive at least one year after their matched case’s death (index-date). Hospital admissions, emergency department visits, drug prescriptions, specialist visits and laboratory tests that occurred 365 days before death/index-date, have been evaluated. Odds Ratios (ORs) for healthcare utilization were estimated through conditional regression models, further adjusted for Charlson Comorbidity Index and stratified by gender, age groups and major causes of death. Results: Decedents were significantly more likely of having at least one hospital admission (OR 7.0, 6.9–7.1), emergency department visit (OR 5.2, 5.1–5.3), drug prescription (OR 2.8, 2.7–2.9), specialist visit (OR 1.4, 1.4–1.4) and laboratory test (OR 2.7, 2.6–2.7) than their matched surviving counterparts. The ORs were generally lower in the oldest age group (95+) than in the youngest (55–74). Healthcare utilization did not vary by sex, but was higher in subjects who died of cancer. Conclusion: Closeness to death appeared to be strongly associated with healthcare utilization in adult/elderly subjects. The risk seems to be greater among younger age groups than older ones, especially for acute based services. Reducing acute healthcare at the EOL represents an important issue to improve the quality of life in proximity to death.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Canova & Paola Anello & Claudio Barbiellini Amidei & Vito Parolin & Loris Zanier & Lorenzo Simonato, 2019. "Use of healthcare services at the end of life in decedents compared to their surviving counterparts: A case-control study among adults born before 1946 in Friuli Venezia Giulia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0212086
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212086&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0212086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0212086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.