IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved and semi-automated reductive β-elimination workflow for higher throughput protein O-glycosylation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilianos Kotsias
  • Radoslaw P Kozak
  • Richard A Gardner
  • Manfred Wuhrer
  • Daniel I R Spencer

Abstract

Protein O-glycosylation has shown to be critical for a wide range of biological processes, resulting in an increased interest in studying the alterations in O-glycosylation patterns of biological samples as disease biomarkers as well as for patient stratification and personalized medicine. Given the complexity of O-glycans, often a large number of samples have to be analysed in order to obtain conclusive results. However, most of the O-glycan analysis work done so far has been performed using glycoanalytical technologies that would not be suitable for the analysis of large sample sets, mainly due to limitations in sample throughput and affordability of the methods. Here we report a largely automated system for O-glycan analysis. We adapted reductive β-elimination release of O-glycans to a 96-well plate system and transferred the protocol onto a liquid handling robot. The workflow includes O-glycan release, purification and derivatization through permethylation followed by MALDI-TOF-MS. The method has been validated according to the ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines for the validation of analytical procedures. The semi-automated reductive β-elimination system enabled for the characterization and relative quantitation of O-glycans from commercially available standards. Results of the semi-automated method were in good agreement with the conventional manual in-solution method while even outperforming it in terms of repeatability. Release of O-glycans for 96 samples was achieved within 2.5 hours, and the automated data acquisition on MALDI-TOF-MS took less than 1 minute per sample. This largely automated workflow for O-glycosylation analysis showed to produce rapid, accurate and reliable data, and has the potential to be applied for O-glycan characterization of biological samples, biopharmaceuticals as well as for biomarker discovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilianos Kotsias & Radoslaw P Kozak & Richard A Gardner & Manfred Wuhrer & Daniel I R Spencer, 2019. "Improved and semi-automated reductive β-elimination workflow for higher throughput protein O-glycosylation analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210759
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210759&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas T Ventham & Richard A Gardner & Nicholas A Kennedy & Archana Shubhakar & Rahul Kalla & Elaine R Nimmo & IBD-BIOM Consortium & Daryl L Fernandes & Jack Satsangi & Daniel I R Spencer, 2015. "Changes to Serum Sample Tube and Processing Methodology Does Not Cause Inter-Individual Variation in Automated Whole Serum N-Glycan Profiling in Health and Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.