IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0208569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization patterns of traditional medicine in Taiwan and South Korea by using national health insurance data in 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Wen Huang
  • I-Hsuan Hwang
  • Ye-seul Lee
  • Shinn-Jang Hwang
  • Seong-Gyu Ko
  • Fang-Pey Chen
  • Bo-Hyoung Jang

Abstract

Background: The growing popularity of traditional medicine (TM) is reflected in the increasing trend for its use worldwide. Many people are turning to use TM as a complementary or integrative treatment. The aim of this study is to present the first nationwide report describing the use of TM in two countries (South Korea and Taiwan). Materials and methods: To present the TM utilization patterns between South Korea and Taiwan, we analyzed data from the National Health Insurance cohorts in each country, each of which has approximately one million inhabitants. Results: In total, 261,478 (25.5%) of 1,025,340 people in South Korea and 260,529 (26.8%) of 970,866 people in Taiwan used TM services at least once under the National Health Insurance in 2011. Using multivariable logistic regression, TM users in South Korea were significantly more likely to be female, 61–80 years of age and individuals with a high income, and those in Taiwan were significantly more likely to be female, 21–40 years of age and individuals with a middle income. The two countries showed similar utilization patterns in visit seasons. People visited TM clinics more frequently than TM hospitals in both countries. The most common TM treatment in South Korea was acupuncture, whereas in Taiwan, various powdered Chinese herbal preparations were the most commonly used treatment. The most common diseases for people seeking TM services were musculoskeletal system and connective tissue diseases in South Korea and Symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions in Taiwan. Conclusion: According to the National Health Insurance database, about one fourth of the NHI beneficiaries of South Korea and Taiwan had TM use in 2011. Different TM utilization patterns existed between South Korea and Taiwan, which might be due to the differences in insurance coverage between the two countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Wen Huang & I-Hsuan Hwang & Ye-seul Lee & Shinn-Jang Hwang & Seong-Gyu Ko & Fang-Pey Chen & Bo-Hyoung Jang, 2018. "Utilization patterns of traditional medicine in Taiwan and South Korea by using national health insurance data in 2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208569
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208569
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208569&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0208569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.