IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0208354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Kejian Wu
  • Haitao Pan
  • Chen Li
  • Qingbo Zhao
  • Ling Wang
  • Jielai Xia

Abstract

Analytical similarity assessment of critical quality attributes (CQAs) serves as a foundation for the development of biosimilar products and facilitates an abbreviated subsequent clinical evaluation. In this study, we establish a statistical evaluation roadmap with statistical approaches for some selected CQAs from Tier 1, because they are most relevant to clinical outcomes and require the most rigorous statistical methods. In the roadmap, we incorporate 3 methods—ranking and tier assignment of quality attributes, the equivalence test, and the Mann–Whitney test for equivalence—that are important to determine analytical similarity between the reference and biosimilar products. For the equivalence test, we develop a power calculation formula based on the two one-sided tests procedure. Exact sample sizes can be numerically calculated. Then, we propose a flexible idea for selecting the number of reference lots (nR) and the number of biosimilar lots (nT) to adjust for serious unbalanced sample sizes. From results of extensive simulations under various parameter settings, we obtain a workable strategy to determine the optimum sample size combination (nT, nR) for the equivalence test of CQAs from Tier 1. R codes are provided to facilitate implementation of the roadmap and corresponding methods in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kejian Wu & Haitao Pan & Chen Li & Qingbo Zhao & Ling Wang & Jielai Xia, 2018. "An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208354
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208354&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0208354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.