IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0207362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of CT radiomics to predict treatment response of individual liver metastases in esophagogastric cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Remy Klaassen
  • Ruben T H M Larue
  • Banafsche Mearadji
  • Stephanie O van der Woude
  • Jaap Stoker
  • Philippe Lambin
  • Hanneke W M van Laarhoven

Abstract

In this study we investigate a CT radiomics approach to predict response to chemotherapy of individual liver metastases in patients with esophagogastric cancer (EGC). In eighteen patients with metastatic EGC treated with chemotherapy, all liver metastases were manually delineated in 3D on the pre-treatment and evaluation CT. From the pre-treatment CT scans 370 radiomics features were extracted per lesion. Random forest (RF) models were generated to discriminate partial responding (PR, >65% volume decrease, including 100% volume decrease), and complete remission (CR, only 100% volume decrease) lesions from other lesions. RF-models were build using a leave one out strategy where all lesions of a single patient were removed from the dataset and used as validation set for a model trained on the lesions of the remaining patients. This process was repeated for all patients, resulting in 18 trained models and one validation set for both the PR and CR datasets. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics with corresponding area under the curve (AUC). In total 196 liver metastases were delineated on the pre-treatment CT, of which 99 (51%) lesions showed a decrease in size of more than 65% (PR). From the PR set a total of 47 (47% of RL, 24% of initial) lesions were no longer detected in CT scan 2 (CR). The RF-model for PR lesions showed an average training AUC of 0.79 (range: 0.74–0.83) and 0.65 (95% ci: 0.57–0.73) for the combined validation set. The RF-model for CR lesions had an average training AUC of 0.87 (range: 0.83–0.90) and 0.79 (95% ci 0.72–0.87) for the validation set. Our findings show that individual response of liver metastases varies greatly within and between patients. A CT radiomics approach shows potential in discriminating responding from non-responding liver metastases based on the pre-treatment CT scan, although further validation in an independent patient cohort is needed to validate these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Remy Klaassen & Ruben T H M Larue & Banafsche Mearadji & Stephanie O van der Woude & Jaap Stoker & Philippe Lambin & Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, 2018. "Feasibility of CT radiomics to predict treatment response of individual liver metastases in esophagogastric cancer patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207362
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207362&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0207362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.