IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critically ill healthcare workers with the middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS): A multicenter study

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Shalhoub
  • Fahad Al-Hameed
  • Yasser Mandourah
  • Hanan H Balkhy
  • Awad Al-Omari
  • Ghaleb A Al Mekhlafi
  • Ayman Kharaba
  • Basem Alraddadi
  • Abdullah Almotairi
  • Kasim Al Khatib
  • Ahmed Abdulmomen
  • Ismael Qushmaq
  • Ahmed Mady
  • Othman Solaiman
  • Abdulsalam M Al-Aithan
  • Rajaa Al-Raddadi
  • Ahmed Ragab
  • Abdulrahman Al Harthy
  • Eman Al Qasim
  • Jesna Jose
  • Ghassan Al-Ghamdi
  • Laura Merson
  • Robert Fowler
  • Frederick G Hayden
  • Yaseen M Arabi

Abstract

Background: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) leads to healthcare-associated transmission to patients and healthcare workers with potentially fatal outcomes. Aim: We aimed to describe the clinical course and functional outcomes of critically ill healthcare workers (HCWs) with MERS. Methods: Data on HCWs was extracted from a multi-center retrospective cohort study on 330 critically ill patients with MERS admitted between (9/2012–9/2015). Baseline demographics, interventions and outcomes were recorded and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Survivors were approached with questionnaires to elucidate their functional outcomes using Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. Findings: Thirty-Two HCWs met the inclusion criteria. Comorbidities were recorded in 34% (11/32) HCW. Death resulted in 8/32 (25%) HCWs including all 5 HCWs with chronic renal impairment at baseline. Non-surviving HCW had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios 63.5 (57, 116.2) vs 148 (84, 194.3), p = 0.043, and received more ECMO therapy compared to survivors, 9/32 (28%) vs 4/24 (16.7%) respectively (p = 0.02).Thirteen of the surviving (13/24) HCWs responded to the questionnaire. Two HCWs confirmed functional limitations. Median number of days from hospital discharge until the questionnaires were filled was 580 (95% CI 568, 723.5) days. Conclusion: Approximately 10% of critically ill patients with MERS were HCWs. Hospital mortality rate was substantial (25%). Patients with chronic renal impairment represented a particularly high-risk group that should receive extra caution during suspected or confirmed MERS cases clinical care assignment and during outbreaks. Long-term repercussions of critical illness due to MERS on HCWs in particular, and patients in general, remain unknown and should be investigated in larger studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Shalhoub & Fahad Al-Hameed & Yasser Mandourah & Hanan H Balkhy & Awad Al-Omari & Ghaleb A Al Mekhlafi & Ayman Kharaba & Basem Alraddadi & Abdullah Almotairi & Kasim Al Khatib & Ahmed Abdulmomen , 2018. "Critically ill healthcare workers with the middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS): A multicenter study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206831
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206831&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. 42. Selected Data of Coronavirus in Spain, United States, Europe, America and other areas, year 2020: Statistics of Cases and Hospital beds
      by MCG Blogs de Economía in Euro-American Association: World Development on 2020-05-12 09:25:00

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.