IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A statistical test and sample size recommendations for comparing community composition following PCA

Author

Listed:
  • John R Skalski
  • Shelby M Richins
  • Richard L Townsend

Abstract

Many investigations of anthropogenic and natural impacts in ecological systems attempt to detect differences in ecological variables or community composition. Frequently, ordination procedures such as principal components analysis (PCA) or canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) are used to simplify such complex data sets into a set of primary factors that express the variation across the original variables. Scatterplots of the first and second principal components are then used to visually inspect for differences in community composition between treatment groups. We present a multidimensional extension of analysis of variance based on an analysis of distance (ANODIS) that can be used to formally test for differences in community composition using 1, 2, or more dimensions of a PCA or CCA of the original sample observations. The statistical tests of significance are based on F-statistics adapted for the analysis of this multidimensional data. Because the analysis is parametric, power and sample size calculations useful in the design of field studies can be readily computed. The use of ANODIS is illustrated using bivariate PCA scatterplots from three published studies. Statistical power calculations using the noncentral F-distribution are illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • John R Skalski & Shelby M Richins & Richard L Townsend, 2018. "A statistical test and sample size recommendations for comparing community composition following PCA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206033
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206033
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206033&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.