IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0205740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science

Author

Listed:
  • Cassandra Vieten
  • Helané Wahbeh
  • B Rael Cahn
  • Katherine MacLean
  • Mica Estrada
  • Paul Mills
  • Michael Murphy
  • Shauna Shapiro
  • Dean Radin
  • Zoran Josipovic
  • David E Presti
  • Michael Sapiro
  • Jan Chozen Bays
  • Peter Russell
  • David Vago
  • Fred Travis
  • Roger Walsh
  • Arnaud Delorme

Abstract

The science of meditation has grown tremendously in the last two decades. Most studies have focused on evaluating the clinical effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions, neural and other physiological correlates of meditation, and individual cognitive and emotional aspects of meditation. Far less research has been conducted on more challenging domains to measure, such as group and relational, transpersonal and mystical, and difficult aspects of meditation; anomalous or extraordinary phenomena related to meditation; and post-conventional stages of development associated with meditation. However, these components of meditation may be crucial to people’s psychological and spiritual development, could represent important mediators and/or mechanisms by which meditation confers benefits, and could themselves be important outcomes of meditation practices. In addition, since large numbers of novices are being introduced to meditation, it is helpful to investigate experiences they may encounter that are not well understood. Over the last four years, a task force of meditation researchers and teachers met regularly to develop recommendations for expanding the current meditation research field to include these important yet often neglected topics. These meetings led to a cross-sectional online survey to investigate the prevalence of a wide range of experiences in 1120 meditators. Results show that the majority of respondents report having had many of these anomalous and extraordinary experiences. While some of the topics are potentially controversial, they can be subjected to rigorous scientific investigation. These arenas represent largely uncharted scientific terrain and provide excellent opportunities for both new and experienced researchers. We provide suggestions for future directions, with accompanying online materials to encourage such research.

Suggested Citation

  • Cassandra Vieten & Helané Wahbeh & B Rael Cahn & Katherine MacLean & Mica Estrada & Paul Mills & Michael Murphy & Shauna Shapiro & Dean Radin & Zoran Josipovic & David E Presti & Michael Sapiro & Jan , 2018. "Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205740
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205740
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205740&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0205740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.