IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0205529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adoption of hypertension reference framework: An investigation among primary care physicians of Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Fang
  • Harry H X Wang
  • Miaoyin Liang
  • Ming Sze Yeung
  • Colette Leung
  • Chun Hei Chan
  • Wilson Cheung
  • Jason L W Huang
  • Junjie Huang
  • Regina W S Sit
  • Samuel Y S Wong
  • Martin C S Wong

Abstract

Background: The Hong Kong Government released a Reference Framework (RF-HT) for Hypertension Care for Adults in Primary Care Settings since 2010. No studies have evaluated its adoption by primary care physicians (PCPs) since its release. Aim: We aimed to evaluate the level of PCPs’ adoption of the RF-HT and the potential barriers of its use in family practice. Design and setting: A cross-sectional study was conducted by a self-administered validated survey among all PCPs in Hong Kong through various means. Methods: We assessed the level of and factors associated with its adoption by multivariate logistic regression modelling. Result: A total of 3,857 invitation episodes were sent to 2,297 PCPs in 2014–2015. We received 383 completed questionnaires. The average score of adoption was 3.43 out of 4.00, and 47.5% of PCPs highly adopted RF-HT in their daily consultations. Male practitioners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.290–0.948, p = 0.033) and PCPs of public sector (aOR = 0.524, 95% CI = 0.292–0.940, p = 0.030) were significantly less likely to adopt the RF-HT. PCPs with higher training completion or being academic fellow are more likely to adopt RF-HT than those who were “nil to basic training completion” (aOR = 0.479, 95% CI = 0.269–0.853, p = 0.012) or “higher trainee” (aOR = 0.302, 95% CI = 0.093–0.979, p = 0.046). Three most-supported suggestions on RF-HT improvement were simplification of RF-HT, provision of pocket version and promoting in patients. Conclusion: Among PCP respondents, the adoption level of the RF-HT was high. These findings also highlighted some factors associated with its adoption that could inform targeted interventions for enhancing its use in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Fang & Harry H X Wang & Miaoyin Liang & Ming Sze Yeung & Colette Leung & Chun Hei Chan & Wilson Cheung & Jason L W Huang & Junjie Huang & Regina W S Sit & Samuel Y S Wong & Martin C S Wong, 2018. "The adoption of hypertension reference framework: An investigation among primary care physicians of Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205529
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205529&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0205529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.