IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of community dialogues and sensitization on patient reporting of adverse events in rural Uganda: Uncontrolled before-after study

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Byomire Ndagije
  • Leonard Manirakiza
  • Dan Kajungu
  • Edward Galiwango
  • Donna Kusemererwa
  • Sten Olsson
  • Anne Spinewine
  • Niko Speybroeck

Abstract

Background: Patients experiencing adverse drug events (ADE) in many developing countries are in the best position to report these events to the authorities but need to be empowered to do so. Systematic evaluation of community engagement and patient support especially in rural areas would provide evidence for a program to monitor potential harm from medicines. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a community dialogue and sensitization (CDS) program on the knowledge, attitude and practises of community members for reporting ADE. Methods: This an uncontrolled before-after study was conducted in two eastern Ugandan districts between September 2016 and August 2017 Results: After implementation of the community dialogue and sensitization (CDS) program, there was an overall 20% (95% CI:16% to 25%) increase in knowledge about ADE in the community compared to before the program began. Awareness levels increased by 50% (95% CI: 37% to 63%) among those with little or no education and by41% (95% CI: 31% to 52%) among young people (15–24 years). Furthermore, 5% (95% CI: 3% to 7%) more respondents recognized the need for reporting ADEs compared to before the program. Finally, there was a significant increase of 115% (95% CI:137% to 217%) in respondent recognition and reporting of ADEs compared to the beginning of the CDS program. Overall, this community found the CDS program acceptable and proposed aspects that could be improved for future use. Conclusion: Our evaluation showed that the CDS program increased knowledge and improved attitudes by catalyzing discussions among community members and healthcare professionals on health issues and monitoring safety of medicines compared to before the program. Successful implementation of the program depends on holistic health systems strengthening and adaptation to the community’s way of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Byomire Ndagije & Leonard Manirakiza & Dan Kajungu & Edward Galiwango & Donna Kusemererwa & Sten Olsson & Anne Spinewine & Niko Speybroeck, 2019. "The effect of community dialogues and sensitization on patient reporting of adverse events in rural Uganda: Uncontrolled before-after study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203721
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203721&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.