IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric sagittal alignment parameters in a young healthy adult population

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Kinel
  • Moreno D’Amico
  • Piero Roncoletta

Abstract

This paper describes and presents a stable and reliable set of stereo-photogrammetric normative data for global and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, as a proven reference system for evaluating/measuring a fully unconstrained natural upright neutral standing attitude in a young healthy adult population. The methodological features described in this article will enable future studies to replicate and/or directly compare a wide range of different postural tests and/or sagittal alignment assessment procedures including the study of sagittal spine shape variations occurring during gait performance. To date, the quantitative evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been mainly confined to the X-ray imaging approach and, more recently, to 3D X-ray reconstruction. Within the existing evaluation framework an opportunity exists for an additional approach: a quantitative evaluation procedure which is easy, accurate, relatively speedy and non-ionising, in order to monitor and track the progress of patients in the areas of both surgical and non-surgical treatment. The resources and methodology described in this paper have been proven to meet all these criteria. They have enabled full 3D posture (including 3D spine shape and sagittal alignment of the skeleton) to be consistently and successfully measured in adult volunteers. All the measurement/evaluation procedures and outcomes carried out were based entirely on the new non-ionising 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric approach described in this article. The protocol for this methodology was based on a standard set of 27 pre-selected anatomical “landmarks” on the human body, providing standard reference points for observation and measurement. A total of 124 healthy subjects were successfully assessed and, for each subject, 27 individual markers were applied to the corresponding locations on his/her body. Statistical tests to investigate gender differences were also carried out. Descriptive statistics are provided for all 15 of the spino-pelvic parameters under consideration. Results indicated significant differences between genders in five sets of parameters: Kyphosis tilt, Head tilt, Pelvic tilt, Spino-pelvic angle and T1-pelvic angle. The data also demonstrate a high degree of congruity with results obtained using the X-ray method, as evidenced by the existing literature in the field. In summary, the current study presents a new stereo-photogrammetric opto-electronic technology which can be used successfully for ASD evaluation and introduces a comprehensive set of normative data analogous to those proposed in X-ray analysis for sagittal spino-pelvic and total body alignment.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Kinel & Moreno D’Amico & Piero Roncoletta, 2018. "Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric sagittal alignment parameters in a young healthy adult population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203679
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203679
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203679&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingyuan Yang & Changwei Yang & Haijian Ni & Yuechao Zhao & Ming Li, 2016. "The Relationship between T1 Sagittal Angle and Sagittal Balance: A Retrospective Study of 119 Healthy Volunteers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Stefan Schmid & Daniel Studer & Carol-Claudius Hasler & Jacqueline Romkes & William R Taylor & Reinald Brunner & Silvio Lorenzetti, 2015. "Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Yoshiki Asai & Shunji Tsutsui & Hiroyuki Oka & Noriko Yoshimura & Hiroshi Hashizume & Hiroshi Yamada & Toru Akune & Shigeyuki Muraki & Ko Matsudaira & Hiroshi Kawaguchi & Kozo Nakamura & Sakae Tanaka , 2017. "Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in adults: The Wakayama Spine Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Negrini & Joel Pollet & Giorgia Ranica & Sabrina Donzelli & Massimiliano Vanossi & Barbara Piovanelli & Cinzia Amici & Riccardo Buraschi, 2022. "Movement Analysis Could Help in the Assessment of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: Results from a Preliminary Explorative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wojciech Piotr Kiebzak & Arkadiusz Łukasz Żurawski & Michał Kosztołowicz, 2022. "Alignment of the Sternum and Sacrum as a Marker of Sitting Body Posture in Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.