IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-progression survival after cessation of treatment with nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Yukihiro Yano
  • Hiroyuki Kurebe
  • Ryuya Edahiro
  • Yuki Hosono
  • Saeko Nakatsubo
  • Kohei Nishida
  • Nobuyuki Sawa
  • Mikako Ishijima
  • Takeshi Uenami
  • Masaki Kanazu
  • Yuki Akazawa
  • Toshihiko Yamaguchi
  • Masahide Mori

Abstract

Objectives: The effectiveness of treatment after cessation of nivolumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well investigated. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical benefit of post-nivolumab treatment in such patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression or adverse events at the Toneyama National Hospital between January 2016 and April 2017. Results: Among 64 patients treated with nivolumab, 26 patients received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression (n = 21) or adverse events (n = 5). The median age of the patients was 68 years and 19 patients were male. Nineteen patients had performance status (PS) 1 or less at initiation of post-nivolumab treatment. Four, 20, and 2 patients were treated with platinum doublets, a single agent, and molecular targeting agents, respectively. Response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of first-line post-nivolumab treatment were 34.6% (9 patients), 73.1% (19 patients), and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–5.2), respectively. Adverse events (≥ grade 3) and treatment cessation were observed in 57.7% (15 patients) and 19.2% (5 patients), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for the majority of patient characteristics between the groups with (n = 26) and without post-nivolumab treatment. However, PS at cessation of nivolumab and post-progression survival (PPS) after cessation of nivolumab (median PPS: 12.6 vs. 1.4 months, 95% CI: 3.8–14.7 vs. 0.4–2.2) were significantly different between the groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed significant correlation of PS at cessation of nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.87) and post-nivolumab treatment (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43) with prolonged PPS after nivolumab. Conclusion: Median post-progression survival in patients with advanced NSCLC who received post-nivolumab treatment was approximately 1 year.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukihiro Yano & Hiroyuki Kurebe & Ryuya Edahiro & Yuki Hosono & Saeko Nakatsubo & Kohei Nishida & Nobuyuki Sawa & Mikako Ishijima & Takeshi Uenami & Masaki Kanazu & Yuki Akazawa & Toshihiko Yamaguchi , 2018. "Post-progression survival after cessation of treatment with nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203070
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203070&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.