IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0202472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection and validation of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis in pear leaf tissues under distinct training systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Liu
  • Kexin Cheng
  • Zhongqi Qin
  • Tao Wu
  • Xianming Li
  • Junfan Tu
  • Fuchen Yang
  • Hongyan Zhu
  • Li Yang

Abstract

Training systems generally alter tree architecture, which modulates light microclimate within the canopy, for the purpose of improving photosynthetic efficiency and fruit quality. Gene expression quantification is one of the most important methods for exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying the influence of training systems on pear photosynthesis, and suitable reference genes for gene expression normalization are a prerequisite for this method. In this study, the expression stability of nine common and four novel candidate genes were evaluated in 14 different pear leaf samples in two training systems, including those at four developmental stages (training_period) and from different parts of the trees (training_space), using two distinct algorithms, geNorm and NormFinder. Our results revealed that SKD1 (Suppressor of K+ Transport Growth Defect1)/ YLS8 (Yellow Leaf Specific 8) and ARM (Armadillo) were the most stable single reference genes for the ‘training_period’ and ‘training_space’ subsets, respectively, although these single genes were not as stable as the optimal pairs of reference genes, SKD1+YLS8 and ARM+YLS8, respectively. Furthermore, the expression levels of the PpsAPX (Ascorbate peroxidase) gene showed that the arbitrary use of reference genes without previous testing could lead to misinterpretation of data. This work constitutes the first systematic analysis regarding the selection of superior reference genes in training system studies, facilitating the elucidation of gene function in pear and providing valuable information for similar studies in other higher plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Liu & Kexin Cheng & Zhongqi Qin & Tao Wu & Xianming Li & Junfan Tu & Fuchen Yang & Hongyan Zhu & Li Yang, 2018. "Selection and validation of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis in pear leaf tissues under distinct training systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202472
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202472
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202472&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0202472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.