IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spacing of cue-approach training leads to better maintenance of behavioral change

Author

Listed:
  • Akram Bakkour
  • Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
  • Neta Cohen
  • Ashleigh M Hover
  • Russell A Poldrack
  • Tom Schonberg

Abstract

The maintenance of behavioral change over the long term is essential to achieve public health goals such as combatting obesity and drug use. Previous work by our group has demonstrated a reliable shift in preferences for appetitive foods following a novel non-reinforced training paradigm. In the current studies, we tested whether distributing training trials over two consecutive days would affect preferences immediately after training as well as over time at a one-month follow-up. In four studies, three different designs and an additional pre-registered replication of one sample, we found that spacing of cue-approach training induced a shift in food choice preferences over one month. The spacing and massing schedule employed governed the long-term changes in choice behavior. Applying spacing strategies to training paradigms that target automatic processes could prove a useful tool for the long-term maintenance of health improvement goals with the development of real-world behavioral change paradigms that incorporate distributed practice principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Akram Bakkour & Rotem Botvinik-Nezer & Neta Cohen & Ashleigh M Hover & Russell A Poldrack & Tom Schonberg, 2018. "Spacing of cue-approach training leads to better maintenance of behavioral change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201580
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201580
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201580&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.