IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First trimester prenatal screening biomarkers and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Brittney M Donovan
  • Nichole L Nidey
  • Elizabeth A Jasper
  • Jennifer G Robinson
  • Wei Bao
  • Audrey F Saftlas
  • Kelli K Ryckman

Abstract

Biomarkers commonly assessed in prenatal screening have been associated with a number of adverse perinatal and birth outcomes. However, it is not clear whether first trimester measurements of prenatal screening biomarkers are associated with subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to systematically review and statistically summarize studies assessing the relationship between first trimester prenatal screening biomarker levels and GDM development. We comprehensively searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus (from inception through January 2018) and manually searched the reference lists of all relevant articles. We included original, published, observational studies examining the association of first trimester pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and/or free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) levels with GDM diagnosis. Mean differences were calculated comparing PAPP-A and free β-hCG multiples of median (MoM) levels between women who developed GDM and those who did not and were subsequently pooled using two-sided random-effects models. Our meta-analysis of 13 studies on PAPP-A and nine studies on free β-hCG indicated that first trimester MoM levels for both biomarkers were lower in women who later developed GDM compared to women who remained normoglycemic throughout pregnancy (MD -0.17; 95% CI -0.24, -0.10; MD -0.04; 95% CI -0.07–0.01). There was no evidence for between-study heterogeneity among studies on free β-hCG (I2 = 0%). A high level of between-study heterogeneity was detected among the studies reporting on PAPP-A (I2 = 90%), but was reduced after stratifying by geographic location, biomarker assay method, and timing of GDM diagnosis. Our meta-analysis indicates that women who are diagnosed with GDM have lower first trimester levels of both PAPP-A and free β-hCG than women who remain normoglycemic throughout pregnancy. Further assessment of the predictive capacity of these biomarkers within large, diverse populations is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brittney M Donovan & Nichole L Nidey & Elizabeth A Jasper & Jennifer G Robinson & Wei Bao & Audrey F Saftlas & Kelli K Ryckman, 2018. "First trimester prenatal screening biomarkers and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201319
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201319
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201319&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federica Visconti & Paola Quaresima & Eusebio Chiefari & Patrizia Caroleo & Biagio Arcidiacono & Luigi Puccio & Maria Mirabelli & Daniela P. Foti & Costantino Di Carlo & Raffaella Vero & Antonio Brune, 2019. "First Trimester Combined Test (FTCT) as a Predictor of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.