IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of six months sputum culture conversion as a surrogate endpoint in a multidrug resistant-tuberculosis trial

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Meyvisch
  • Chrispin Kambili
  • Koen Andries
  • Nacer Lounis
  • Myriam Theeuwes
  • Brian Dannemann
  • An Vandebosch
  • Wim Van der Elst
  • Geert Molenberghs
  • Ariel Alonso

Abstract

The emergence of multidrug resistant-tuberculosis (MDR-TB), defined as Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with in vitro resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin, has necessitated evaluation and validation of appropriate surrogate endpoints for treatment response in drug trials for MDR-TB. The trial that has demonstrated efficacy of bedaquiline, a diarylquinoline that inhibits mycobacterial ATP synthase, possesses the requisite features to conduct this evaluation. Approval of bedaquiline for use in MDR-TB was based primarily on the results of the controlled C208 Stage II study (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00449644) including 160 patients randomized 1:1 to receive bedaquiline or placebo for 24 weeks when added to an 18–24-month preferred five-drug background regimen. Since randomization in C208 Stage II was preserved until study end, the trial results allow for the investigation of the complex relationship between sustained durable outcome with either Week 8 or Week 24 culture conversion as putative surrogate endpoints. The relationship between Week 120 outcome with Week 8 or Week 24 culture conversion was investigated using a descriptive analysis and with a recently developed statistical methodology for surrogate endpoint evaluation using methods of causal inference.The results demonstrate that sputum culture conversion at 24 weeks is more reliable than sputum culture conversion at 8 weeks when assessing the outcome of adding one new drug to a MDR-TB regimen.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Meyvisch & Chrispin Kambili & Koen Andries & Nacer Lounis & Myriam Theeuwes & Brian Dannemann & An Vandebosch & Wim Van der Elst & Geert Molenberghs & Ariel Alonso, 2018. "Evaluation of six months sputum culture conversion as a surrogate endpoint in a multidrug resistant-tuberculosis trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200539
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200539&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ariel Alonso & Wim Van der Elst & Geert Molenberghs & Marc Buyse & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2016. "An information-theoretic approach for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints based on causal inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 669-677, September.
    2. Robert S Wallis & Thomas Peppard & David Hermann, 2015. "Month 2 Culture Status and Treatment Duration as Predictors of Recurrence in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Model Validation and Update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.