IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive framework for codend size selection of brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) in the North Sea beam-trawl fishery

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Santos
  • Bent Herrmann
  • Daniel Stepputtis
  • Claudia Günther
  • Bente Limmer
  • Bernd Mieske
  • Sebastian Schultz
  • Thomas Neudecker
  • Axel Temming
  • Marc Hufnagl
  • Eckhard Bethke
  • Gerd Kraus

Abstract

The brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) fishery is of great socio-economic importance to coastal communities on the North Sea. The fishery is exploited by beam trawlers often using codends with very small mesh sizes, leading to concerns about catch rates of undersized shrimp. However, little information is available on codend size selection, making it difficult to provide scientifically based advice on alternative codend designs. Therefore, this study establishes a predictive framework for codend size selection of brown shrimp, based on a large selectivity dataset from 33 different codend designs tested during four experimental fishing cruises, during which more than 350,000 brown shrimp were length measured. Predictions by the framework confirm concerns about the exploitation pattern in the fishery, because the retention probability of undersized shrimp reaches 95% with the currently applied designs. The framework predictions allow the exploration of obtainable exploitation patterns depending on codend design. For example, increasing codend mesh size to 25–29 mm would reduce the retention rate of undersized shrimp to a maximum of 50%, depending on codend mesh type.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Santos & Bent Herrmann & Daniel Stepputtis & Claudia Günther & Bente Limmer & Bernd Mieske & Sebastian Schultz & Thomas Neudecker & Axel Temming & Marc Hufnagl & Eckhard Bethke & Gerd Kraus, 2018. "Predictive framework for codend size selection of brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) in the North Sea beam-trawl fishery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200464
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200464
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200464&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.