IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical dilemma of identity disclosure faced by medical students in clinical clerkships: A nationwide multicenter study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zhao
  • Yihan Cao
  • Lu Che
  • Qining Fu
  • Shuang Song
  • Bingbin Zhao
  • Shuo Zhang
  • Weiwen Zhang
  • Xiang Li
  • Stephanie Choi
  • Jun Zhao
  • Hanwen Zhang
  • Yunzhu Li
  • Haopeng Xu
  • Hui Pan

Abstract

Objective: Medical students in China are currently facing a dilemma of whether to clarify their identity as students to patients. Further investigation is needed to support policy-making. The aim was to identify factors influencing medical students’ decision on whether or not to clarify their identity to patients and to examine the effects of their decision. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional nationwide multicenter survey consisting of 947 medical students. A self-designed questionnaire was composed of 19 structured questions investigating the present situation and participants’ perception of the ethical dilemma surrounding medical student identity. The questionnaires were distributed randomly in teaching hospitals affiliated with 13 medical schools across China from June 2015 to January 2016. Results: A total of 947 valid questionnaires were retrieved with a valid response rate of 83.7%. Most medical students (71.4%) tended to be ambiguous about their student identity in front of patients. The frequency of encountering distrust and patients’ or patient relatives’ refusal to allow students to perform procedures was significantly lower for students who explicitly stated their identity than for those who were ambiguous about their identity (p 1 y, OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.5), preceptors’ straightforward introduction of the students (OR 8.7, 95% CI 5.4–13.8) and students’ acknowledgment of patients’ right to know (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.5) were related to students’ clear self-introduction to patients. Conclusion: It is beneficial for medical students to clearly explain their identity to patients in order to decrease patient distrust and prevent the refusal to have certain appropriate procedures performed. Several methods, including emphasizing the role of mentors, developing curriculum for medical students, and creating clear regulations and guidelines for revealing the identity of medical students on the healthcare team can help address and ideally resolve this ethical dilemma of identity disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zhao & Yihan Cao & Lu Che & Qining Fu & Shuang Song & Bingbin Zhao & Shuo Zhang & Weiwen Zhang & Xiang Li & Stephanie Choi & Jun Zhao & Hanwen Zhang & Yunzhu Li & Haopeng Xu & Hui Pan, 2018. "Ethical dilemma of identity disclosure faced by medical students in clinical clerkships: A nationwide multicenter study in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200335
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200335&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.