IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a large-scale, population-based cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study

Author

Listed:
  • Takahiro Maeda
  • Hiroshi Hashizume
  • Noriko Yoshimura
  • Hiroyuki Oka
  • Yuyu Ishimoto
  • Keiji Nagata
  • Masanari Takami
  • Shunji Tsutsui
  • Hiroshi Iwasaki
  • Akihito Minamide
  • Yukihiro Nakagawa
  • Yasutsugu Yukawa
  • Shigeyuki Muraki
  • Sakae Tanaka
  • Hiroshi Yamada
  • Munehito Yoshida

Abstract

Objective: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) who have radiographically similar degrees of stenosis may not necessarily exhibit equivalent symptoms. As part of a cross-sectional study, we examined factors associated with symptomatic LSS (sLSS) in the general population of Japan. Methods: We evaluated 968 participants (men, 319; women, 649) between 2008 and 2010. Orthopedic surgery specialists diagnosed sLSS using interview results, medical examinations, and imaging findings. LSS was radiographically graded using a 4-level scale. Additionally, we examined basic anthropometry, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, ankle-brachial index values (ABI), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. We grouped patients with moderate and severe radiographic LSS, and compared the indicated factors on the basis of the presence/absence of sLSS. Data were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Radiographically, 451 participants had moderate and 288 severe stenosis. Clinically, 92 participants were diagnosed with sLSS, including 36 with moderate and 52 with severe stenosis. In the moderate stenosis group, participants with sLSS had significantly higher rates of diabetes mellitus (DM) and lower ABIs than did non-LSS participants. Although sLSS participants tended to be older (p = 0.19), there were no significant differences in the sex distribution, body mass index values, or in the percentages of participants who were drinkers/smokers. In the severe stenosis group, there were no differences in any of the evaluated factors. Multiple logistic regression showed that DM (odds ratio [OR], 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52–9.34]) and low ABI (1 SD = 0.09; OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04–1.81) were significantly associated with LSS in the moderate stenosis group. Conclusions: DM and low ABIs are significantly associated with sLSS in patients with moderate radiographic stenosis. Neither factor is associated with sLSS in patients with severe stenosis. Notably, the effects of intrinsic factors on symptomology may be masked when anatomic stenosis is severe.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahiro Maeda & Hiroshi Hashizume & Noriko Yoshimura & Hiroyuki Oka & Yuyu Ishimoto & Keiji Nagata & Masanari Takami & Shunji Tsutsui & Hiroshi Iwasaki & Akihito Minamide & Yukihiro Nakagawa & Yasuts, 2018. "Factors associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a large-scale, population-based cohort: The Wakayama Spine Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200208
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200208&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.