IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and psychometric properties of short form of central sensitization inventory in participants with musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiko Nishigami
  • Katsuyoshi Tanaka
  • Akira Mibu
  • Masahiro Manfuku
  • Satoko Yono
  • Akihito Tanabe

Abstract

Background: The central sensitization inventory (CSI) comprises 25 items and is commonly used to measure somatic and emotional symptoms related to central sensitization symptoms. CSI was developed as an easy-to-administer screening instrument for patients at high risk of developing central sensitization in whom it was essential to quickly evaluate the condition. The purpose of the present study was to develop a short form of CSI and evaluate its psychometric properties using a contemporary approach called Rasch analysis. Methods: A total of 505 patients with musculoskeletal disorders were recruited in this study. The CSI, pain intensity, pain interference, and the health-related quality of life (QOL) were evaluated for each participant. The original CSI items were consecutively analyzed using the Rasch model. Successive Rasch analyses were performed until a final set of items satisfied the model fit requirements. We also analyzed the psychometric properties of the original and short forms of CSI. Results: Four consecutive Rasch analyses identified the removable items. Finally, the shortest questionnaire obtained that maintained the correct psychometric properties based on the Rasch model contained only 9 items (CSI-9). Rasch analysis showed that the CSI-9 had acceptable internal consistency, exhibited unidimensionality, had no notable differential item functioning, and was functional on the category rating scale. Conclusions: The nine-item short form of CSI has acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable for use for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Thus, the CSI-9 can be used as a brief instrument to evaluate central sensitization.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiko Nishigami & Katsuyoshi Tanaka & Akira Mibu & Masahiro Manfuku & Satoko Yono & Akihito Tanabe, 2018. "Development and psychometric properties of short form of central sensitization inventory in participants with musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200152
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200152
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200152&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hayato Shigetoh & Teppei Abiko & Michie Ohyama & Eiji Sakata & Shin Murata, 2022. "Associations of Central Sensitization-Related Symptoms with Low Back Pain-Related Factors and Work Status in Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-8, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.