IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Induction of labor after one previous Cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: A retrospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Tove Wallstrom
  • Jenny Bjorklund
  • Joanna Frykman
  • Hans Jarnbert-Pettersson
  • Helena Akerud
  • Elisabeth Darj
  • Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
  • Eva Wiberg-Itzel

Abstract

Objective: Uterine rupture is a well-known but unusual complication in vaginal deliveries with a Cesarean section in the history. The risk of uterine rupture is at least two-fold when labor is induced. In Sweden, women are allowed to deliver vaginally after one previous Cesarean section, regardless if labor starts spontaneously or is induced. The aim of the study is to compare the proportion of uterine ruptures between the three methods (balloon catheter, Minprostin® and Cytotec®) for induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix and one previous Cesarean section. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study of all women with one previous Cesarean section and induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix at the four largest clinics in Stockholm during 2012–2015. Inclusion criteria: Women with a previous Cesarean section and induction of labor with a viable fetus, cephalic presentation, singleton, at ≥34 w, (n = 910). Results: 3.0% (27/910) of the women with induction of labor had a uterine rupture, 91% of them had no previous vaginal delivery. The proportion of uterine ruptures was 2.0% (6/295) with orally administrated Cytotec®, 2.1% (7/335) with balloon catheter and 5.0% (14/ 281) when Minprostin® was used. Conclusions: No difference in the proportion of uterine ruptures was shown when orally administrated Cytotec® and balloon catheter were compared (p = 0.64). Orally administrated Cytotec® and balloon catheter give a high success rate of vaginal deliveries (almost 70%) despite an unfavorable cervix.

Suggested Citation

  • Tove Wallstrom & Jenny Bjorklund & Joanna Frykman & Hans Jarnbert-Pettersson & Helena Akerud & Elisabeth Darj & Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson & Eva Wiberg-Itzel, 2018. "Induction of labor after one previous Cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: A retrospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200024
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200024&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.