IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0199786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of the revised World Health Organization cluster survey methodology to classify measles-rubella vaccination campaign coverage in 47 counties in Kenya, 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Saleena Subaiya
  • Collins Tabu
  • James N’ganga
  • Abdulkadir Amin Awes
  • Kibet Sergon
  • Leonard Cosmas
  • Ashley Styczynski
  • Samson Thuo
  • Emmaculate Lebo
  • Reinhard Kaiser
  • Robert Perry
  • Peter Ademba
  • Katrina Kretsinger
  • Iheoma Onuekwusi
  • Howard Gary
  • Heather M Scobie

Abstract

Introduction: To achieve measles elimination, two doses of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) are provided through routine immunization services or vaccination campaigns. In May 2016, Kenya conducted a measles-rubella (MR) vaccination campaign targeting 19 million children aged 9 months–14 years, with a goal of achieving ≥95% coverage. We conducted a post-campaign cluster survey to estimate national coverage and classify coverage in Kenya’s 47 counties. Methods: The stratified multi-stage cluster survey included data from 20,011 children in 8,253 households sampled using the recently revised World Health Organization coverage survey methodology (2015). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of national campaign coverage were calculated, accounting for study design. County vaccination coverage was classified as ‘pass,’ ‘fail,’ or ‘intermediate,’ using one-sided hypothesis tests against a 95% threshold. Results: Estimated national MR campaign coverage was 95% (95% CI: 94%-96%). Coverage differed significantly (p

Suggested Citation

  • Saleena Subaiya & Collins Tabu & James N’ganga & Abdulkadir Amin Awes & Kibet Sergon & Leonard Cosmas & Ashley Styczynski & Samson Thuo & Emmaculate Lebo & Reinhard Kaiser & Robert Perry & Peter Ademb, 2018. "Use of the revised World Health Organization cluster survey methodology to classify measles-rubella vaccination campaign coverage in 47 counties in Kenya, 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199786
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199786&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0199786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.