IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0198499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Naoko Yamamoto
  • Tetsuya Hirata
  • Gentaro Izumi
  • Akari Nakazawa
  • Shinya Fukuda
  • Kazuaki Neriishi
  • Tomoko Arakawa
  • Masashi Takamura
  • Miyuki Harada
  • Yasushi Hirota
  • Kaori Koga
  • Osamu Wada-Hiraike
  • Tomoyuki Fujii
  • Minoru Irahara
  • Yutaka Osuga

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine public attitudes towards third-party reproduction and the disclosure of conception through third-party reproduction. Methods: We conducted the web-based survey for the public attitude towards third-party reproduction in February 2014. Twenty-five hundred people were recruited with equal segregation of age (20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s) and gender. We analyzed the association between gender, age, infertility, and ethical view using a questionnaire regarding donor sperm, donor oocyte, donor embryo, gestational surrogacy, and disclosure to offspring. Results: Of the respondents, 36.2% approved and 26.6% disapproved of gamete or embryo donation. The frequency of those who approved was lowest in females in the 50–59 year age group, and was significantly higher in males or females with infertility. Secondly, 40.9% approved and 21.8% disapproved of gestational surrogacy. The frequency of those who approved gestational surrogacy was higher in males or females with infertility. Thirdly, 46.3% of respondents agreed and 20.4% disagreed with “offspring have the right to know their origin”. Those who disagreed were primarily in the 50–59 year age group of both genders, and disagreement was significantly higher in the infertility group compared with non-infertility group. Conclusion: In this study, public attitudes were affected by gender, age, and experience of infertility. These study findings are important in understanding the attitude towards third-party reproduction and disclosure to the offspring. Respondents having indecisive attitudes were >30%, which might indicate an increased requirement for information and education to enhance the discussion on the ethical consensus on third-party reproduction in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoko Yamamoto & Tetsuya Hirata & Gentaro Izumi & Akari Nakazawa & Shinya Fukuda & Kazuaki Neriishi & Tomoko Arakawa & Masashi Takamura & Miyuki Harada & Yasushi Hirota & Kaori Koga & Osamu Wada-Hirai, 2018. "A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198499
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198499&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0198499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.