IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin after knee arthroscopy: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hai-Feng Huang
  • Jia-Liang Tian
  • Xian-Teng Yang
  • Li Sun
  • Ru-Yin Hu
  • Zhi-Hui Yan
  • Shan-Shan Li
  • Quan Xie
  • Xiao-Bin Tian

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered a potentially serious complication of knee arthroscopy and leads to conditions such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is widely employed in knee arthroscopy to reduce perioperative thromboembolic complications. However, the efficacy and safety of LMWH in knee arthroscopy remains unclear. Methods: Seven randomized controlled clinical trials on LMWH in knee arthroscopy were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The main outcomes of the effectiveness (prevention of DVT and PE) and complications (death, major bleeding, and minor bleeding) of LMWH in knee arthroscopic surgery were assessed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: The meta-analysis indicated that LMWH prophylaxis comprised 79% of asymptomatic DVT. No association was found in symptomatic VTE (RR: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39–2.08; P = 0.80), symptomatic DVT (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.28–2.23; P = 0.66), symptomatic PE (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.37–4.97; P = 0.64) and major bleeding (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.12–3.95; P = 0.68) risk during LMWH prophylaxis were identified. Death was not reported in these studies. Moreover, there was a lower incidence of minor bleeding (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.83; P = 0.001) in the control group than in the LMWH group. Conclusion: Compared with the control group, the group treated with LMWH after knee arthroscopy was no association in reducing the symptomatic VTE rate, symptomatic DVT rate or symptomatic PE rate. The symptomatic VTE rate was 0.5% (11/2,166) in the LMWH group versus 0.6% (10/1,713) in the control group. Although the limitations of this meta-analysis cannot be ignored, the results of our study show that LMWH after knee arthroscopy is ineffective. We recommend that LMWH should not be routinely provided for knee arthroscopy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03164746

Suggested Citation

  • Hai-Feng Huang & Jia-Liang Tian & Xian-Teng Yang & Li Sun & Ru-Yin Hu & Zhi-Hui Yan & Shan-Shan Li & Quan Xie & Xiao-Bin Tian, 2018. "Efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin after knee arthroscopy: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197868
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197868&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.