IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness and safety of Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: an observational study from Southern Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Scotti
  • Giulio Disanto
  • Rosaria Sacco
  • Marilu’ Guigli
  • Chiara Zecca
  • Claudio Gobbi

Abstract

Background: Despite positive results from phase II and observational studies, Rituximab (RTX) is not currently approved for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment and can only be used off-label. Objective: To characterize MS patients treated with RTX and investigate its effectiveness and safety in a clinical practice setting. Methods: Observational analysis of data collected from MS patients at the Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland. Relapses, EDSS worsening, MRI lesion accrual and "evidence of disease activity” (EDA) status were described by Cox regression. RTX and natalizumab treated patients were matched by propensity scores. Results: Out of 453 MS patients, 82 were treated with RTX, 43 (52.4%) relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and 39 (47.6%) progressive MS (median age = 48 [40–54] years, females n = 60 [73.2%], EDSS = 4.0 [2.5–6.0], median follow-up = 1.5 [1.0–2.5] years). Three relapses occurred and 59 (75.6%) patients had not EDA at follow-up end. Time to EDA was similar in RTX and natalizumab treated RRMS patients (HR = 1.64, 95%CI = 0.46–5.85, p = 0.44). Twenty-four patients presented non infusion related adverse events (infections), requiring RTX discontinuation in 6 individuals. Conclusion: These results provide further evidence for RTX being effective in MS treatment, to a similar extent to natalizumab in RRMS. Clinicians must be vigilant for the potential occurrence of infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Scotti & Giulio Disanto & Rosaria Sacco & Marilu’ Guigli & Chiara Zecca & Claudio Gobbi, 2018. "Effectiveness and safety of Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: an observational study from Southern Switzerland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197415
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197415&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.