IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-site evaluation of the LN34 pan-lyssavirus real-time RT-PCR assay for post-mortem rabies diagnostics

Author

Listed:
  • Crystal M Gigante
  • Lisa Dettinger
  • James W Powell
  • Melanie Seiders
  • Rene Edgar Condori Condori
  • Richard Griesser
  • Kenneth Okogi
  • Maria Carlos
  • Kendra Pesko
  • Mike Breckenridge
  • Edson Michael M Simon
  • Maria Yna Joyce V Chu
  • April D Davis
  • Scott J Brunt
  • Lillian Orciari
  • Pamela Yager
  • William C Carson
  • Claire Hartloge
  • Jeremiah T Saliki
  • Susan Sanchez
  • Mojgan Deldari
  • Kristina Hsieh
  • Ashutosh Wadhwa
  • Kimberly Wilkins
  • Veronica Yung Peredo
  • Patricia Rabideau
  • Nina Gruhn
  • Rolain Cadet
  • Shrikrishna Isloor
  • Sujith S Nath
  • Tomy Joseph
  • Jinxin Gao
  • Ryan Wallace
  • Mary Reynolds
  • Victoria A Olson
  • Yu Li

Abstract

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease that requires fast, accurate diagnosis to prevent disease in an exposed individual. The current gold standard for post-mortem diagnosis of human and animal rabies is the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test. While the DFA test has proven sensitive and reliable, it requires high quality antibody conjugates, a skilled technician, a fluorescence microscope and diagnostic specimen of sufficient quality. The LN34 pan-lyssavirus real-time RT-PCR assay represents a strong candidate for rabies post-mortem diagnostics due to its ability to detect RNA across the diverse Lyssavirus genus, its high sensitivity, its potential for use with deteriorated tissues, and its simple, easy to implement design. Here, we present data from a multi-site evaluation of the LN34 assay in 14 laboratories. A total of 2,978 samples (1,049 DFA positive) from Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East were tested. The LN34 assay exhibited low variability in repeatability and reproducibility studies and was capable of detecting viral RNA in fresh, frozen, archived, deteriorated and formalin-fixed brain tissue. The LN34 assay displayed high diagnostic specificity (99.68%) and sensitivity (99.90%) when compared to the DFA test, and no DFA positive samples were negative by the LN34 assay. The LN34 assay produced definitive findings for 80 samples that were inconclusive or untestable by DFA; 29 were positive. Five samples were inconclusive by the LN34 assay, and only one sample was inconclusive by both tests. Furthermore, use of the LN34 assay led to the identification of one false negative and 11 false positive DFA results. Together, these results demonstrate the reliability and robustness of the LN34 assay and support a role for the LN34 assay in improving rabies diagnostics and surveillance.

Suggested Citation

  • Crystal M Gigante & Lisa Dettinger & James W Powell & Melanie Seiders & Rene Edgar Condori Condori & Richard Griesser & Kenneth Okogi & Maria Carlos & Kendra Pesko & Mike Breckenridge & Edson Michael , 2018. "Multi-site evaluation of the LN34 pan-lyssavirus real-time RT-PCR assay for post-mortem rabies diagnostics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197074
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197074&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.