IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0196557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Natália Mello Santos
  • Maísa Camillo Jordão
  • Franciny Querobim Ionta
  • Fernanda Lyrio Mendonça
  • Camilla Cristina Lira Di Leone
  • Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
  • Thais Marchini Oliveira
  • Heitor Marques Honório
  • Thiago Cruvinel
  • Daniela Rios

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the period of use and location of intraoral appliances on enamel surface loss. This randomized, single blind in situ study was conducted in 2 crossover phases based on the period of use, in which maxillary and mandibular appliances were simultaneously worn. Bovine enamel blocks (n = 120) were randomly divided among the studied groups by surface hardness. In each phase, fifteen volunteers used one maxillary appliance and two mandibular appliances for 5 days. Erosive challenge was performed 4X/day by immersion in 0.01 M HCL for 2 minutes. In the continuous phase, the intraoral appliances were worn for 20 hours. In the intermittent phase the appliances were worn for 8 hours and 30 minutes. Enamel loss was determined profilometrically. The discomfort of use of the appliances were evaluated in a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test and chi-square test (p

Suggested Citation

  • Natália Mello Santos & Maísa Camillo Jordão & Franciny Querobim Ionta & Fernanda Lyrio Mendonça & Camilla Cristina Lira Di Leone & Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf & Thais Marchini Oliveira & Heitor Marq, 2018. "Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196557
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196557
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196557&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0196557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.