IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0196270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Deflandre
  • Nicolas Piette
  • Vincent Bonhomme
  • Stephanie Degey
  • Laurent Cambron
  • Robert Poirrier
  • Jean-Francois Brichant
  • Jean Joris

Abstract

Background: Severe obstructive sleep apnea (sOSA) and preoperative hypoxemia are risk factors of postoperative complications. Patients exhibiting the combination of both factors are probably at higher perioperative risk. Four scores (STOP-Bang, P-SAP, OSA50, and DES-OSA) are currently used to detect OSA patients preoperatively. This study compared their ability to specifically detect hypoxemic sOSA patients. Methods: One hundred and fifty-nine patients scheduled for an overnight polysomnography (PSG) were prospectively enrolled. The ability of the four scores to predict the occurrence of hypoxemic episodes in sOSA patients was compared using sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), Youden Index, Cohen kappa coefficient, and the area under ROC curve (AUROC) analyses. Results: OSA50 elicited the highest Se [95% CI] at detecting hypoxemic sOSA patients (1 [0.89–1]) and was significantly more sensitive than STOP-Bang in that respect. DES-OSA was significantly more specific (0.58 [0.49–0.66]) than the three other scores. The Youden Index of DES-OSA (1.45 [1.33–1.58]) was significantly higher than those of STOP-Bang, P-SAP, and OSA50. The AUROC of DES-OSA (0.8 [0.71–0.89]) was significantly the largest. The highest Kappa value was obtained for DES-OSA (0.33 [0.21–0.45]) and was significantly higher than those of STOP-Bang, and OSA50. Conclusions: In our population, DES-OSA appears to be more effective than the three other scores to specifically detect hypoxemic sOSA patients. However prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings in a perioperative setting. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02050685.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Deflandre & Nicolas Piette & Vincent Bonhomme & Stephanie Degey & Laurent Cambron & Robert Poirrier & Jean-Francois Brichant & Jean Joris, 2018. "Comparison of clinical scores in their ability to detect hypoxemic severe OSA patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196270
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196270&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0196270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.