IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0194221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No differences in objective dynamic instability during acceleration of the knee with or without subjective instability post-total knee arthroplasty

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Soeno
  • Tomoharu Mochizuki
  • Osamu Tanifuji
  • Hiroshi Koga
  • Takayuki Murayama
  • Hiroki Hijikata
  • Yuki Takahashi
  • Naoto Endo

Abstract

Introduction: Instability after total knee arthroplasty is a critical problem. The purpose of this study was to clarify the stability of implanted knees during walking by comparing differences in dynamic instability during knee acceleration between individuals with or without previously experienced subjective instability, as measured by self-reported questionnaire. Materials and methods: We examined 92 knees with medial pivot implants. Mean patient age and follow-up duration were 78.4 years and 32.8 months, respectively. An accelerometer was used to investigate the accelerations along three axes; that is, vertical (VT), mediolateral (ML), and anteroposterior (AP) directions in 3-dimensional (3D) space. The analysis in the stance phase and gait cycle was performed by: (1) root mean square (RMS) values of acceleration and (2) frequency domain analysis using fast Fourier transformation (FFT). A self-reported knee instability score was used for the subjective feeling of instability. Results: A total of 76 knees did not feel unstable (group 0), but 16 knees felt unstable (group 1) in patients during activities of daily living. Regarding the RMS, there were no differences in each direction between the groups. For FFT, the cumulative amplitude in the frequency

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Soeno & Tomoharu Mochizuki & Osamu Tanifuji & Hiroshi Koga & Takayuki Murayama & Hiroki Hijikata & Yuki Takahashi & Naoto Endo, 2018. "No differences in objective dynamic instability during acceleration of the knee with or without subjective instability post-total knee arthroplasty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194221
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194221&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0194221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.