IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0193977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of multiple drug resistance on total medical costs among patients with intra-abdominal infections in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuemei Zhen
  • Yuanyuan Li
  • Yixi Chen
  • Peng Dong
  • Stephanie Liu
  • Hengjin Dong

Abstract

Background: Multiple drug resistant (MDR) intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are associated with notable direct and societal costs. As previous studies have not considered the impact of MDR on the total medical costs (TMCs) of IAIs, the present one examines this, as well as further estimates the additional costs at a national level. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Firstly, we randomly selected a sample of 40% of all inpatients discharged between 2014 and 2015 from a teaching hospital, due to limits in budget and the large number of patients. Then, we manually selected 254 patients with IAIs according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, using electronic medical records. Eventually, 101 patients with IAIs (64 MDR patients and 37 non-MDR patients) were included after excluding cases without laboratory test results, any pathogens detected, or antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Univariate analysis and a generalized linear model were applied to assess the parameters associated with TMCs. Results: Compared to non-MDR patients, those with MDR pathogens were significantly associated with higher TMCs, higher antimicrobial costs, higher antimicrobial usage, larger number of pathogens, and longer length of stay and were more likely to have insurance and combination antimicrobial therapy. In addition, the average TMC among patients with MDR pathogens was ¥ 131801, which is ¥ 90201 higher than those without MDR pathogens. If our results are applied to the whole country, the sum of all attributable TMCs was ¥ 37 billion. The societal costs, furthermore, were ¥111 billion in 2015. Conclusion: Our results provide information that should lead to increased efforts to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, in order to decrease the emergence of MDR pathogens and to reduce their economic burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuemei Zhen & Yuanyuan Li & Yixi Chen & Peng Dong & Stephanie Liu & Hengjin Dong, 2018. "Effect of multiple drug resistance on total medical costs among patients with intra-abdominal infections in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193977
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193977
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193977&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0193977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago Grau & Virginia Lozano & Amparo Valladares & Rafael Cavanillas & Yang Xie & Gonzalo Nocea, 2015. "Impact of a Dynamic Microbiological Environment on the Clinical Efficacy of Ertapenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection in Spain:," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 369-379, August.
    2. Yong Pil Chong & In-Gyu Bae & Sang-Rok Lee & Jin-Won Chung & Jae-Bum Jun & Eun Ju Choo & Soo-youn Moon & Mi Suk Lee & Min Hyok Jeon & Eun Hee Song & Eun Jung Lee & Seong Yeon Park & Yang Soo Kim, 2015. "Clinical and Economic Consequences of Failure of Initial Antibiotic Therapy for Patients with Community-Onset Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.