IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0193234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducibility of estimated optimal peak output using a force-velocity test on a cycle ergometer

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel J Coelho-e-Silva
  • Ricardo Rebelo-Gonçalves
  • Diogo Martinho
  • Alexis Ahmed
  • Leonardo G O Luz
  • João P Duarte
  • Vítor Severino
  • Rafael C Baptista
  • João Valente-dos-Santos
  • Vasco Vaz
  • Rui S Gonçalves
  • Antonio Tessitore
  • António J Figueiredo

Abstract

The current study aimed to examine the reproducibility of estimated peak power and estimated pedal velocity in a multi-trial 10-s all-out cycling test among adult athletes (n = 22; aged 23.50±4.73 years). Stature, sitting height and body mass were measured. Leg length was estimated as stature minus sitting height. Body volume was obtained from air displacement plethysmography and was subsequently used to calculate body density. Fat mass and fat-free mass were derived. The short-term power outputs were assessed from the force-velocity test (FVT), using a friction-braked ergometer on two separated occasions. Differences between repeated measurements were examined with paired t-test and effect sizes calculated. No significant differences were found between session 1 (898 W, 142 rpm) and session 2 (906 W, 142 rpm). Test-retest procedure showed acceptable reliability for estimated peak power output [technical error of measurement (TEM) = 31.9 W; % coefficient of variation (CV) = 3.5; intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.986] and pedal velocity (TEM = 5.4 rpm, %CV = 3.8, ICC = 0.924). The current study demonstrated a reasonable reproducibility of estimated peak power and pedal velocity outputs in non-elite male athletes and supports that a familiarization session including a complete FVT protocol is not required.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel J Coelho-e-Silva & Ricardo Rebelo-Gonçalves & Diogo Martinho & Alexis Ahmed & Leonardo G O Luz & João P Duarte & Vítor Severino & Rafael C Baptista & João Valente-dos-Santos & Vasco Vaz & Rui S, 2018. "Reproducibility of estimated optimal peak output using a force-velocity test on a cycle ergometer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193234
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193234&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0193234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.