IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0192420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood ratios of quantitative laboratory results in medical diagnosis: The application of Bézier curves in ROC analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Fierz

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is widely used to describe the discriminatory power of a diagnostic test to differentiate between populations having or not having a specific disease, using a dichotomous threshold. In this way, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) can be calculated to be used in Bayes’ way of estimating disease probabilities. Similarly, LRs can be calculated for certain ranges of test results. However, since many diagnostic tests are of quantitative nature, it would be desirable to estimate LRs for each quantitative result. These LRs are equal to the slope of the tangent to the ROC curve at the corresponding point. Since the exact distribution of test results in diseased and non-diseased people is often not known, the calculation of such LRs for quantitative test results is not straightforward. Here, a simple distribution-independent method is described to reach this goal using Bézier curves that are defined by tangents to a curve. The use of such a method would help in standardizing quantitative test results, which are not always comparable between different test providers, by reporting them as LRs for a specific diagnosis, in addition to, or instead of, quantities such as mg/L or nmol/L, or even indices or units.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Fierz, 2018. "Likelihood ratios of quantitative laboratory results in medical diagnosis: The application of Bézier curves in ROC analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192420
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192420
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192420&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0192420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.