IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing spatial heterogeneity with stock assessment models

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto Jardim
  • Margit Eero
  • Alexandra Silva
  • Clara Ulrich
  • Lionel Pawlowski
  • Steven J Holmes
  • Leire Ibaibarriaga
  • José A A De Oliveira
  • Isabel Riveiro
  • Nekane Alzorriz
  • Leire Citores
  • Finlay Scott
  • Andres Uriarte
  • Pablo Carrera
  • Erwan Duhamel
  • Iago Mosqueira

Abstract

This paper describes a methodology that combines meta-population theory and stock assessment models to gain insights about spatial heterogeneity of the meta-population in an operational time frame. The methodology was tested with stochastic simulations for different degrees of connectivity between sub-populations and applied to two case studies, North Sea cod (Gadus morua) and Northeast Atlantic sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Considering that the biological components of a population can be partitioned into discrete spatial units, we extended this idea into a property of additivity of sub-population abundances. If the additivity results hold true for putative sub-populations, then assessment results based on sub-populations will provide information to develop and monitor the implementation of finer scale/local management. The simulation study confirmed that when sub-populations are independent and not too heterogeneous with regards to productivity, the sum of stock assessment model estimates of sub-populations’ SSB is similar to the SSB estimates of the meta-population. It also showed that a strong diffusion process can be detected and that the stronger the connection between SSB and recruitment, the better the diffusion process will be detected. On the other hand it showed that weak to moderate diffusion processes are not easy to identify and large differences between sub-populations productivities may be confounded with weak diffusion processes. The application to North Sea cod and Atlantic sardine exemplified how much insight can be gained. In both cases the results obtained were sufficiently robust to support the regional analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto Jardim & Margit Eero & Alexandra Silva & Clara Ulrich & Lionel Pawlowski & Steven J Holmes & Leire Ibaibarriaga & José A A De Oliveira & Isabel Riveiro & Nekane Alzorriz & Leire Citores & Finl, 2018. "Testing spatial heterogeneity with stock assessment models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190791
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190791&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.