IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of knowledge translation from health technology assessment to policy-making in China: From the perspective of researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbin Liu
  • Lizheng Shi
  • Raymond W Pong
  • Hengjin Dong
  • Yiwei Mao
  • Meng Tang
  • Yingyao Chen

Abstract

Background: For health technology assessment (HTA) to be more policy relevant and for health technology-related decision-making to be truly evidence-based, promoting knowledge translation (KT) is of vital importance. Although some research has focused on KT of HTA, there is a dearth of literature on KT determinants and the situation in developing countries and transitional societies remains largely unknown. Objective: To investigate the determinants of HTA KT from research to health policy-making from the perspective of researchers in China. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A structured questionnaire which focused on KT was distributed to HTA researchers in China. KT activity levels in various fields of HTA research were compared, using one-way ANOVA. Principal component analysis was performed to provide a basis to combine similar variables. To investigate the determinants of KT level, multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Results: Based on a survey of 382 HTA researchers, it was found that HTA KT wasn’t widespread in China. Furthermore, results showed that no significant differences existed between the various HTA research fields. Factors, such as attitudes of researchers toward HTA and evidence utilization, academic ranks and linkages between researchers and policy-makers, had significant impact on HTA KT (p-values

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbin Liu & Lizheng Shi & Raymond W Pong & Hengjin Dong & Yiwei Mao & Meng Tang & Yingyao Chen, 2018. "Determinants of knowledge translation from health technology assessment to policy-making in China: From the perspective of researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190732
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190732&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.